<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CliffsNotes: The Morality Comment Thread (Part 2)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radioopensource.org/cliffsnotes-the-morality-comment-thread-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/cliffsnotes-the-morality-comment-thread-part-2/</link>
	<description>Christopher Lydon in conversation on arts, ideas and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:09:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc McElroy</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/cliffsnotes-the-morality-comment-thread-part-2/#comment-87774</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc McElroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 20:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=1025#comment-87774</guid>
		<description>Thanks Lumiere... However when I said that most professors don&#039;t know which end of a computer to blow into I meant it litterally, as in ZERO computer literacy among many older teachers, and much less internet access.    So the students exersize the age old Soviet tradition of stealing other people&#039;s words.   Something like, &quot;they pretend to grade us, and we pretend to write..&quot;



Anyway the question is are these people born with a moral compass and then society teaches them otherwise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Lumiere&#8230; However when I said that most professors don&#8217;t know which end of a computer to blow into I meant it litterally, as in ZERO computer literacy among many older teachers, and much less internet access.    So the students exersize the age old Soviet tradition of stealing other people&#8217;s words.   Something like, &#8220;they pretend to grade us, and we pretend to write..&#8221;</p>
<p>Anyway the question is are these people born with a moral compass and then society teaches them otherwise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: herbert browne</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/cliffsnotes-the-morality-comment-thread-part-2/#comment-87773</link>
		<dc:creator>herbert browne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=1025#comment-87773</guid>
		<description>Yo. Lumiere... re &quot;plagiarism&quot;- maybe you should pitch a show on &quot;hilarious software&quot;! (still laughing... hard to type).   ^..^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yo. Lumiere&#8230; re &#8220;plagiarism&#8221;- maybe you should pitch a show on &#8220;hilarious software&#8221;! (still laughing&#8230; hard to type).   ^..^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: herbert browne</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/cliffsnotes-the-morality-comment-thread-part-2/#comment-87772</link>
		<dc:creator>herbert browne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 18:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=1025#comment-87772</guid>
		<description>(from AlanK) ..&quot;The latter (evolved) is a descriptive approach to morality, trying to say what it is, how it developed, whereas the former (god-given) is a normative approach, trying to tell us how we ought to act..&quot;

Isn&#039;t a &quot;normative&quot; attempt to describe morality self-referential? I mean, Morality is about &quot;what ought to be&quot;; and Normativity is about &quot;what ought to be..&quot; In both cases, I see no more (or less) &quot;relativism&quot; than that which you impute to an evolved morality [(ibid) &quot;In this regard, I do not see how the denial of God can lead to anything except moral relativism..&quot;], since &quot;God&quot; is a culture-specific reference point.

I agree that we may be examining two different subjects... and also feel that the (alleged) 12yo commentator, Frederick, nailed it. (What was the saying, re &quot;out of the mouths of children..?) I&#039;d also reiterate my own, admittedly hypothetical, proposal that what we call &quot;the Maternal instinct&quot; is a major &#039;driver&#039; of the process that we call &quot;morality&quot;...  ^..^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(from AlanK) ..&#8221;The latter (evolved) is a descriptive approach to morality, trying to say what it is, how it developed, whereas the former (god-given) is a normative approach, trying to tell us how we ought to act..&#8221;</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t a &#8220;normative&#8221; attempt to describe morality self-referential? I mean, Morality is about &#8220;what ought to be&#8221;; and Normativity is about &#8220;what ought to be..&#8221; In both cases, I see no more (or less) &#8220;relativism&#8221; than that which you impute to an evolved morality [(ibid) "In this regard, I do not see how the denial of God can lead to anything except moral relativism.."], since &#8220;God&#8221; is a culture-specific reference point.</p>
<p>I agree that we may be examining two different subjects&#8230; and also feel that the (alleged) 12yo commentator, Frederick, nailed it. (What was the saying, re &#8220;out of the mouths of children..?) I&#8217;d also reiterate my own, admittedly hypothetical, proposal that what we call &#8220;the Maternal instinct&#8221; is a major &#8216;driver&#8217; of the process that we call &#8220;morality&#8221;&#8230;  ^..^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LumiÃ¨re</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/cliffsnotes-the-morality-comment-thread-part-2/#comment-87771</link>
		<dc:creator>LumiÃ¨re</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 20:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=1025#comment-87771</guid>
		<description>Marc McElroy Says: Once the teachers catch up technically,



Here ya go:



http://www.plagiarism.com/screening.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc McElroy Says: Once the teachers catch up technically,</p>
<p>Here ya go:</p>
<p><a  href="http://www.plagiarism.com/screening.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.plagiarism.com/screening.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc McElroy</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/cliffsnotes-the-morality-comment-thread-part-2/#comment-87770</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc McElroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 07:55:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=1025#comment-87770</guid>
		<description>How about calling it: &quot;CliffsNotes: God Given or Evolved.&quot;



I recently explained what CliffsNotes were to some college students here in Moscow, because it came up in a reading.   They were THRILLED with the idea of reading &quot;War and Peace&quot; in 70 pages.    Which brings up a larger point, the moral code for students here is lacking.   To cut and paste a paper together off some web pages is rather common.   Especially since you&#039;re adverage 60 year old porfessor still doesn&#039;t know which end of a computer to blow into, and probably won&#039;t read your paper anyway.    So... I say evolved, because I have found the missing link when it comes to acedemic morality.   Once the teachers catch up technically, and they will, it will close the gap and force a new stage in that evolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about calling it: &#8220;CliffsNotes: God Given or Evolved.&#8221;</p>
<p>I recently explained what CliffsNotes were to some college students here in Moscow, because it came up in a reading.   They were THRILLED with the idea of reading &#8220;War and Peace&#8221; in 70 pages.    Which brings up a larger point, the moral code for students here is lacking.   To cut and paste a paper together off some web pages is rather common.   Especially since you&#8217;re adverage 60 year old porfessor still doesn&#8217;t know which end of a computer to blow into, and probably won&#8217;t read your paper anyway.    So&#8230; I say evolved, because I have found the missing link when it comes to acedemic morality.   Once the teachers catch up technically, and they will, it will close the gap and force a new stage in that evolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

