<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Generation Alito</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/</link>
	<description>Christopher Lydon in conversation on arts, ideas and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:00:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: wacsailor</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-5014</link>
		<dc:creator>wacsailor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 00:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-5014</guid>
		<description>The name of the show is just so... I don&#039;t know... everytime I hear it I think the person is saying open sore.  Yuck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The name of the show is just so&#8230; I don&#8217;t know&#8230; everytime I hear it I think the person is saying open sore.  Yuck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abby</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4901</link>
		<dc:creator>Abby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 16:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4901</guid>
		<description>You all need to check out the site that parodies Ann Althouse for her relentless middle-of-the roadness.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://altmouse.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Altmouse&lt;/a&gt;:
&quot;Totally nonpartisan Bush supporting Constitutional Law Scholar, Ann Altmouse&quot; -- Slate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You all need to check out the site that parodies Ann Althouse for her relentless middle-of-the roadness.  <a href="http://altmouse.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">Altmouse</a>:<br />
&#8220;Totally nonpartisan Bush supporting Constitutional Law Scholar, Ann Altmouse&#8221; &#8212; Slate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peggysue</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4877</link>
		<dc:creator>peggysue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 03:15:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4877</guid>
		<description>Thanks Nikos 

In spite of all the progress we&#039;ve made in the past few decades it is always sobering to be reminded that sexism and misogyny are still very much alive (and right here on Open Source!) This is exactly the scary thing about Alito being confirmed. Feminism is just basic human rights for women. Some men find the concept very threatening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Nikos </p>
<p>In spite of all the progress we&#8217;ve made in the past few decades it is always sobering to be reminded that sexism and misogyny are still very much alive (and right here on Open Source!) This is exactly the scary thing about Alito being confirmed. Feminism is just basic human rights for women. Some men find the concept very threatening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jazzman</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4871</link>
		<dc:creator>jazzman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 00:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4871</guid>
		<description>ALYB says:&gt;&gt; the system must goâ€“thatâ€™s positive! And weâ€™ve NOT accumulated wisdomâ€“weâ€™ve accumulated inertia.&gt;&gt;
 Heâ€™s right â€“ the masses in this country (most likely the world) are indeed inertial, i.e., resistant to change in the status quo. If the liberals (and Iâ€™m pretty darned liberal) are worried about Alitoâ€™s projected effect on their applecart, (theirs and the mediaâ€™s projections) shaking up the status quo in what they consider negative ways, it could be the â€œexterior forceâ€? necessary to rouse the populace from their workaday woes and change direction. As much as I would like to see dramatic change, (the kind a Bork might engender) I am also a passenger on the inertial express and wouldnâ€™t want a catastrophic derailment (punctuation in the equilibrium) to occur. My revolutionary (evolutionary?) energy was expended during the 60â€™s and my current life ainâ€™t so bad, so I leave it to the new generation of idealists to actively right their perceived wrongs. Until a critical mass of people get riled enough to act, nothing significant will change â€“ the web may be just the needed catalyst. See what happens when they start (already started) to restrict that!!! See ALBYâ€™s link, The Google Conundrumâ€?: http://www.lewrockwell.com/shaffer/shaffer129.html. Given the cyclical nature of social unrest, (a sociobiological prediction for Potterâ€™s amusement) Iâ€™m expecting a mid 60â€™s golden anniversary in the next decade or so. Iraq should be at just about the same breaking point in the collective mind as Vietnam was 50 years before.
On the feminism topic: If everyone were Absolutely Moral, feminism and the LAW would be obviated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ALYB says:&gt;&gt; the system must goâ€“thatâ€™s positive! And weâ€™ve NOT accumulated wisdomâ€“weâ€™ve accumulated inertia.&gt;&gt;<br />
 Heâ€™s right â€“ the masses in this country (most likely the world) are indeed inertial, i.e., resistant to change in the status quo. If the liberals (and Iâ€™m pretty darned liberal) are worried about Alitoâ€™s projected effect on their applecart, (theirs and the mediaâ€™s projections) shaking up the status quo in what they consider negative ways, it could be the â€œexterior forceâ€? necessary to rouse the populace from their workaday woes and change direction. As much as I would like to see dramatic change, (the kind a Bork might engender) I am also a passenger on the inertial express and wouldnâ€™t want a catastrophic derailment (punctuation in the equilibrium) to occur. My revolutionary (evolutionary?) energy was expended during the 60â€™s and my current life ainâ€™t so bad, so I leave it to the new generation of idealists to actively right their perceived wrongs. Until a critical mass of people get riled enough to act, nothing significant will change â€“ the web may be just the needed catalyst. See what happens when they start (already started) to restrict that!!! See ALBYâ€™s link, The Google Conundrumâ€?: <a href="http://www.lewrockwell.com/shaffer/shaffer129.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lewrockwell.com/shaffer/shaffer129.html</a>. Given the cyclical nature of social unrest, (a sociobiological prediction for Potterâ€™s amusement) Iâ€™m expecting a mid 60â€™s golden anniversary in the next decade or so. Iraq should be at just about the same breaking point in the collective mind as Vietnam was 50 years before.<br />
On the feminism topic: If everyone were Absolutely Moral, feminism and the LAW would be obviated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikos</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4825</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 03:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4825</guid>
		<description>ALYB: please consider perusing Lynne Segal&#039;s &#039;Why Feminism?&#039; (Columbia University Press, 1999).
Meanwhile, what&#039;ll ya have?  This bartender makes a fine margarita.  And they&#039;re better on the rocks than blended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ALYB: please consider perusing Lynne Segal&#8217;s &#8216;Why Feminism?&#8217; (Columbia University Press, 1999).<br />
Meanwhile, what&#8217;ll ya have?  This bartender makes a fine margarita.  And they&#8217;re better on the rocks than blended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikos</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4823</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 03:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4823</guid>
		<description>peggysue: Ignore him.  He&#039;s my pal, but he&#039;s as clueless about feminism as I am about Judaism.  I&#039;ll take him to the virtual bar and buy him a drink.  Or a few.  Meanwhile, please rest assured that not all men think like that.  (I&#039;m testifying.)  An evening spent with a good book by, say, Lynne Segal, would do all of us loads of good.  (But I&#039;ll try to get him slap-happy first!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>peggysue: Ignore him.  He&#8217;s my pal, but he&#8217;s as clueless about feminism as I am about Judaism.  I&#8217;ll take him to the virtual bar and buy him a drink.  Or a few.  Meanwhile, please rest assured that not all men think like that.  (I&#8217;m testifying.)  An evening spent with a good book by, say, Lynne Segal, would do all of us loads of good.  (But I&#8217;ll try to get him slap-happy first!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A little yellow bird</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4817</link>
		<dc:creator>A little yellow bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 02:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4817</guid>
		<description>&quot;peggysue&quot;: Is there a matriarchal society somewhere? If there is, I&#039;m sure the women there must be pleased as punch, and everything must be just dandy--nothing to complain about. Come on, honey--you&#039;re spending too much time blogging...shouldn&#039;t you be giving more quality time to the marriage or other relationship you wanted so much? I mean, until the man started &quot;not getting it?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;peggysue&#8221;: Is there a matriarchal society somewhere? If there is, I&#8217;m sure the women there must be pleased as punch, and everything must be just dandy&#8211;nothing to complain about. Come on, honey&#8211;you&#8217;re spending too much time blogging&#8230;shouldn&#8217;t you be giving more quality time to the marriage or other relationship you wanted so much? I mean, until the man started &#8220;not getting it?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peggysue</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4816</link>
		<dc:creator>peggysue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 02:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4816</guid>
		<description>yellow bird

My apologies, I assumed, perhaps mistakenly, that you were an American because you used the salutation &quot;dude&quot;. Perhaps I was mistaken, the Internet being global, and you actually live in a matriarchal society somewhere and therefore would quite naturally see no need for feminism</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yellow bird</p>
<p>My apologies, I assumed, perhaps mistakenly, that you were an American because you used the salutation &#8220;dude&#8221;. Perhaps I was mistaken, the Internet being global, and you actually live in a matriarchal society somewhere and therefore would quite naturally see no need for feminism</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A little yellow bird</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4814</link>
		<dc:creator>A little yellow bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 02:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4814</guid>
		<description>&quot;peggysue&quot;: No malice intended, but I don&#039;t know which society you speak of. You&#039;re not going to change my mind, you know--it took me years of consideration to reach the decisions I&#039;ve made. I&#039;m sorry we don&#039;t agree. I believe the ignorance--selective knowing--is yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;peggysue&#8221;: No malice intended, but I don&#8217;t know which society you speak of. You&#8217;re not going to change my mind, you know&#8211;it took me years of consideration to reach the decisions I&#8217;ve made. I&#8217;m sorry we don&#8217;t agree. I believe the ignorance&#8211;selective knowing&#8211;is yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peggysue</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4810</link>
		<dc:creator>peggysue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 01:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4810</guid>
		<description>gingi saidâ€¦

â€œthe whole notion that the conservative movement has been secretly conniving to overturn Roe v. Wade strikes me as conspiratorial and baselessâ€?. 

How true, they have not been secretive about it all.

as for you little yellow birdâ€¦

Granting you the benefit of doubt by assuming that your commentary on feminism is based on ignorance rather than malice I will point out what should be obvious. When an entire segment of society is treated with prejudice and precluded from positions of power based on biology the result is that biology and ideology become inextricably linked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gingi saidâ€¦</p>
<p>â€œthe whole notion that the conservative movement has been secretly conniving to overturn Roe v. Wade strikes me as conspiratorial and baselessâ€?. </p>
<p>How true, they have not been secretive about it all.</p>
<p>as for you little yellow birdâ€¦</p>
<p>Granting you the benefit of doubt by assuming that your commentary on feminism is based on ignorance rather than malice I will point out what should be obvious. When an entire segment of society is treated with prejudice and precluded from positions of power based on biology the result is that biology and ideology become inextricably linked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A little yellow bird</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4772</link>
		<dc:creator>A little yellow bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4772</guid>
		<description>&quot;Nikos&quot;: BTW, I won&#039;t be offering any other opinions of feminism, because I don&#039;t have any; but I will add this: if absolute property rights were restored to the people (obviating any &quot;need&quot; for, or possibility of, socialism), then people, all people, including womyn, would be as protected as laws can protect us. The body, or person, is the first, and most important, property. If possession of one&#039;s self were absolute, there would be next to no state, and every other sort of personal liberty would flow from that point. One could not be conscripted, nor oficially stolen from (taxed) to murder foreigners or railroaded death row inmates, or be forced to pay for public works they may find offensive, such as state-owned communications media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Nikos&#8221;: BTW, I won&#8217;t be offering any other opinions of feminism, because I don&#8217;t have any; but I will add this: if absolute property rights were restored to the people (obviating any &#8220;need&#8221; for, or possibility of, socialism), then people, all people, including womyn, would be as protected as laws can protect us. The body, or person, is the first, and most important, property. If possession of one&#8217;s self were absolute, there would be next to no state, and every other sort of personal liberty would flow from that point. One could not be conscripted, nor oficially stolen from (taxed) to murder foreigners or railroaded death row inmates, or be forced to pay for public works they may find offensive, such as state-owned communications media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gingi</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4770</link>
		<dc:creator>gingi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4770</guid>
		<description>Chris,

You&#039;re just such an alarmist. About politics, jurisprudence, the environment. Your show aired before Alito was officially approved and you&#039;re already throwing up your arms about how the face of jurisprudence has changed. Some law students are too busy with their studies to even have digested how Alito may change their own legal future. The most naive economist will not attribute to Greenspan (so long, and thanks for all the fish) such influence over the market as you ascribe to Alito over American jurisprudence.

As an independent -- though overly optmistic -- libertarian, the whole notion that the conservative movement has been secretly conniving to overturn Roe v. Wade strikes me as conspiratorial and baseless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>You&#8217;re just such an alarmist. About politics, jurisprudence, the environment. Your show aired before Alito was officially approved and you&#8217;re already throwing up your arms about how the face of jurisprudence has changed. Some law students are too busy with their studies to even have digested how Alito may change their own legal future. The most naive economist will not attribute to Greenspan (so long, and thanks for all the fish) such influence over the market as you ascribe to Alito over American jurisprudence.</p>
<p>As an independent &#8212; though overly optmistic &#8212; libertarian, the whole notion that the conservative movement has been secretly conniving to overturn Roe v. Wade strikes me as conspiratorial and baseless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A little yellow bird</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4769</link>
		<dc:creator>A little yellow bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4769</guid>
		<description>&quot;Potter&quot;: But I said something positive already! I said, in effect, that the system must go--that&#039;s positive! And we&#039;ve NOT accumulated wisdom--we&#039;ve accumulated inertia. Conventional &quot;wisdom&quot; is no wisdom at all. BTW, I like ancient Chinese porn more than any of their writings. We will leave depleted uranium--the greatest of all contributions to human posterity, from a standpoint of durability...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Potter&#8221;: But I said something positive already! I said, in effect, that the system must go&#8211;that&#8217;s positive! And we&#8217;ve NOT accumulated wisdom&#8211;we&#8217;ve accumulated inertia. Conventional &#8220;wisdom&#8221; is no wisdom at all. BTW, I like ancient Chinese porn more than any of their writings. We will leave depleted uranium&#8211;the greatest of all contributions to human posterity, from a standpoint of durability&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Potter</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4768</link>
		<dc:creator>Potter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4768</guid>
		<description>ALYB- We are not doing the same thing in the same way and expecting different results, catchy as that phrase is, if only we were.....  We are evolving or devolving or morphing and expecting varous results. We are extremely divided.

The system is not dead yet but it will possibly suffer permanent damage or die if it gets too dangerously out of whack for too long without swinging back to equilibrium. We inherited a  good one though, built on accumulated wisdom.  &quot;Of the people, by the people&quot; was a  revolutionary leap made in good faith.  Maybe the experiment is doomed to fail because of the nature of human nature. We&#039;ve been so successful that we&#039;ve grown fat, greedy, and sleepy. 

Crooks, liars and parasites (of the people) who connived to run the system now are not dealing with reality and so  the system is not growing to deal with reality, but has become self-serving. This is very worrisome. 

But if you opt out out of extreme disgust ( as opposed to moderate disgust) and think that we are already in &quot;the Fourth Reich&quot; and the whole thing needs to be trashed ( and replaced by what? nothing?) then aren&#039;t you contributing to that result?

I&#039;d like to hear something constructive from you before you fly away, little yellow bird. 

If the polls are correct, most people are unhappy with what is going on. This is a good sign. No?

 Tell me about the ancient Chinese----they made great pots wrote beautiful poetry and painted gorgeous scrolls. What will we leave?  ( a show suggestion)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ALYB- We are not doing the same thing in the same way and expecting different results, catchy as that phrase is, if only we were&#8230;..  We are evolving or devolving or morphing and expecting varous results. We are extremely divided.</p>
<p>The system is not dead yet but it will possibly suffer permanent damage or die if it gets too dangerously out of whack for too long without swinging back to equilibrium. We inherited a  good one though, built on accumulated wisdom.  &#8220;Of the people, by the people&#8221; was a  revolutionary leap made in good faith.  Maybe the experiment is doomed to fail because of the nature of human nature. We&#8217;ve been so successful that we&#8217;ve grown fat, greedy, and sleepy. </p>
<p>Crooks, liars and parasites (of the people) who connived to run the system now are not dealing with reality and so  the system is not growing to deal with reality, but has become self-serving. This is very worrisome. </p>
<p>But if you opt out out of extreme disgust ( as opposed to moderate disgust) and think that we are already in &#8220;the Fourth Reich&#8221; and the whole thing needs to be trashed ( and replaced by what? nothing?) then aren&#8217;t you contributing to that result?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to hear something constructive from you before you fly away, little yellow bird. </p>
<p>If the polls are correct, most people are unhappy with what is going on. This is a good sign. No?</p>
<p> Tell me about the ancient Chinese&#8212;-they made great pots wrote beautiful poetry and painted gorgeous scrolls. What will we leave?  ( a show suggestion)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A little yellow bird</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4765</link>
		<dc:creator>A little yellow bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4765</guid>
		<description>&quot;Nikos&quot;: Let &#039;em skip, duuude!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Nikos&#8221;: Let &#8216;em skip, duuude!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikos</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4764</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4764</guid>
		<description>ALYB: a more accurate definition of feminism is: &quot;the idea that the lives of women are of equal value to the lives of men&quot;.  

Clearly this isn&#039;t applicable in cultures that practice barbarities like honor killings (and female genital mutilation) or where pastors historically (and histrionically) exhorted the men of their congregations to (literally) &#039;beat the Devil&#039; out of their wives -- as happened here, in this very country only about four generations ago.

Please ponder this (before offering another questionable/objectionable/offensive opinion of feminism).  You&#039;ve criticized my support of socialism as is your right, and implied that you won&#039;t take seriously my offerings on the topic, as also is your right.  Yet I wonder how you&#039;d feel if you realized that this -- &quot;Feminismâ€“the unsupportable notion that ideology can trump biology&quot; -- has likely just made your ROS tag into a &#039;skip-over&#039; for many readers.
You&#039;re better than that, pal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ALYB: a more accurate definition of feminism is: &#8220;the idea that the lives of women are of equal value to the lives of men&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Clearly this isn&#8217;t applicable in cultures that practice barbarities like honor killings (and female genital mutilation) or where pastors historically (and histrionically) exhorted the men of their congregations to (literally) &#8216;beat the Devil&#8217; out of their wives &#8212; as happened here, in this very country only about four generations ago.</p>
<p>Please ponder this (before offering another questionable/objectionable/offensive opinion of feminism).  You&#8217;ve criticized my support of socialism as is your right, and implied that you won&#8217;t take seriously my offerings on the topic, as also is your right.  Yet I wonder how you&#8217;d feel if you realized that this &#8212; &#8220;Feminismâ€“the unsupportable notion that ideology can trump biology&#8221; &#8212; has likely just made your ROS tag into a &#8217;skip-over&#8217; for many readers.<br />
You&#8217;re better than that, pal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A little yellow bird</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4761</link>
		<dc:creator>A little yellow bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4761</guid>
		<description>&quot;peggysue&quot;: Feminism--the unsupportable notion that ideology can trump biology. Or should. Or needs to...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;peggysue&#8221;: Feminism&#8211;the unsupportable notion that ideology can trump biology. Or should. Or needs to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peggysue</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4760</link>
		<dc:creator>peggysue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4760</guid>
		<description>Oh please dear little yellow bird. Such sweeping generalizations!

&quot;Lefty types seem to be all green, all natural, except when it comes to gender issues: their extreme ideal is the idea of no gender at all, and they seem to think that any differences between the sexes are 100% nurture and 0% nature&quot;.

I&#039;m a Green Lefty Ecofeminist and many of us do see a basic gender difference as an obvious natural phenomina. The problem with gender difference when it comes to the law is that &quot;separate&quot; so rarely satisfies the demand for &quot;equal&quot;. Of course we want equality under the law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh please dear little yellow bird. Such sweeping generalizations!</p>
<p>&#8220;Lefty types seem to be all green, all natural, except when it comes to gender issues: their extreme ideal is the idea of no gender at all, and they seem to think that any differences between the sexes are 100% nurture and 0% nature&#8221;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a Green Lefty Ecofeminist and many of us do see a basic gender difference as an obvious natural phenomina. The problem with gender difference when it comes to the law is that &#8220;separate&#8221; so rarely satisfies the demand for &#8220;equal&#8221;. Of course we want equality under the law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A little yellow bird</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4758</link>
		<dc:creator>A little yellow bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4758</guid>
		<description>&quot;Potter&quot;: I am neither willing to let them off the hook nor let them continue in their activities. Yes, I am much more disgusted than you are--and with no malice intended, anyone who supports the state, which always organizes for war and other forms of subjugation, is perpetuating the problem. Working within the system is like beating a dead horse. It is dead. The ancient Chinese (aren&#039;t Chinese things always ancient?) definition of insanity is doing the same thing in the same way and expecting different results.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Potter&#8221;: I am neither willing to let them off the hook nor let them continue in their activities. Yes, I am much more disgusted than you are&#8211;and with no malice intended, anyone who supports the state, which always organizes for war and other forms of subjugation, is perpetuating the problem. Working within the system is like beating a dead horse. It is dead. The ancient Chinese (aren&#8217;t Chinese things always ancient?) definition of insanity is doing the same thing in the same way and expecting different results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Potter</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4757</link>
		<dc:creator>Potter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4757</guid>
		<description>ALYB you have your own &quot;both sides&quot; which breaks down as the rest of us against &quot;the state&quot;. I am not there yet. I have people who represent how I feel in government that are supposed to work for me. And I am not willing to let them off the hook and declare war on the whole business as you apparently are or have. I feel we need to hold these folks accountable.

I am not giving up by being disgusted. I am disgusted principally at the idea that the Democrats who have the power to resist by using are not. And SOME of them, some on BOTH sides who in their heart of hearts feel differently are caving in out of weakness and pressure and using the rationalization that the president should have the court that he wants. He is entitled in other words. Given the elections of 00 and 04 this disgusts me.

 I did not say that there WAS a conservative court. There will be. And the definition of the word &quot;conservative&quot; is changing or has changed from the past. This is the split within the conservatives which you point out.

There may be more democracy (representing the will of the people) in the Middle East right now than we have.

Do we agree but are we talking past each other? Or are you in a deeper state of disgust than I am?

Perhaps we can agree that the bums need to be thrown out. I still vote. Do you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ALYB you have your own &#8220;both sides&#8221; which breaks down as the rest of us against &#8220;the state&#8221;. I am not there yet. I have people who represent how I feel in government that are supposed to work for me. And I am not willing to let them off the hook and declare war on the whole business as you apparently are or have. I feel we need to hold these folks accountable.</p>
<p>I am not giving up by being disgusted. I am disgusted principally at the idea that the Democrats who have the power to resist by using are not. And SOME of them, some on BOTH sides who in their heart of hearts feel differently are caving in out of weakness and pressure and using the rationalization that the president should have the court that he wants. He is entitled in other words. Given the elections of 00 and 04 this disgusts me.</p>
<p> I did not say that there WAS a conservative court. There will be. And the definition of the word &#8220;conservative&#8221; is changing or has changed from the past. This is the split within the conservatives which you point out.</p>
<p>There may be more democracy (representing the will of the people) in the Middle East right now than we have.</p>
<p>Do we agree but are we talking past each other? Or are you in a deeper state of disgust than I am?</p>
<p>Perhaps we can agree that the bums need to be thrown out. I still vote. Do you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A little yellow bird</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4754</link>
		<dc:creator>A little yellow bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4754</guid>
		<description>A conservative court hasn&#039;t existed for generations. A conservative court would never be activist; would unerringly rule against expansion of all powers, especially in the executive branch. And don&#039;t you see how pervasive the idea of &quot;both sides&quot; is? You say you&#039;re digusted by &quot;both sides&quot;, but there is no both--there&#039;s only the state, which keeps intruding on more and more of life. See? The argument is pre-framed for you, as Pynchon described: they keep you from ever asking the questions that would change anything--</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A conservative court hasn&#8217;t existed for generations. A conservative court would never be activist; would unerringly rule against expansion of all powers, especially in the executive branch. And don&#8217;t you see how pervasive the idea of &#8220;both sides&#8221; is? You say you&#8217;re digusted by &#8220;both sides&#8221;, but there is no both&#8211;there&#8217;s only the state, which keeps intruding on more and more of life. See? The argument is pre-framed for you, as Pynchon described: they keep you from ever asking the questions that would change anything&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Potter</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4752</link>
		<dc:creator>Potter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4752</guid>
		<description>ALYB- it&#039;s not only what is in the constitution, but how it has been interpreted over time. Thus we get excited about &quot;settled law&quot; and respecting precedents. A conservative court over time can re-interpret unsettle, and evicerate and set new precedents or as Althouse said make changes gradually by erosion.  I am not as peaceful as Althouse is about this all.

 I am thoroughly disgusted that so many of our legislators on both sides apparently feel that THIS president has the right to have the SCOTUS he wants especially considering the questionable and very close elections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ALYB- it&#8217;s not only what is in the constitution, but how it has been interpreted over time. Thus we get excited about &#8220;settled law&#8221; and respecting precedents. A conservative court over time can re-interpret unsettle, and evicerate and set new precedents or as Althouse said make changes gradually by erosion.  I am not as peaceful as Althouse is about this all.</p>
<p> I am thoroughly disgusted that so many of our legislators on both sides apparently feel that THIS president has the right to have the SCOTUS he wants especially considering the questionable and very close elections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A little yellow bird</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4750</link>
		<dc:creator>A little yellow bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 12:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4750</guid>
		<description>Dosh garn it! I mean LeGuin!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dosh garn it! I mean LeGuin!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A little yellow bird</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4749</link>
		<dc:creator>A little yellow bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4749</guid>
		<description>&quot;Nikos&quot;: Dividing the court in half by sex won&#039;t ever make a difference because those who seek power aren&#039;t interested in the welfare of the people. Also, there is no everywoman. There is no ERA largely because women don&#039;t want it. Lefty types seem to be all green, all natural, except when it comes to gender issues: their extreme ideal is the idea of no gender at all, and they seem to think that any differences between the sexes are 100% nurture and 0% nature. The idea of 50-50 splits in any aspect of our existence is an illusion--it&#039;s merely another variation of either-or thinking. Far from being &quot;consigned&quot; to the kitchen, it is now a luxury for the rich suburbanite to be economically able to choose to be a soccer/cookie-baking/home for the kids mom. The more things change, the more they stay the same. There will never be equality between the sexes because it is by definition impossible, not because &quot;men just don&#039;t get it&quot;, etc. If you&#039;d like to indulge in some speculation and/or fantasizing about manipulation of gender, may I suggest reading the brilliant (and not shrilly preachy!, deep sigh...) musings of Ursula K. Leguin; especially &quot;The left Hand of Darkness&quot;, and another volume of short stories called something like &quot;The Birthday of the World&quot;, published a few years ago. She must be great in bed, even at, or especially in, her seventies!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Nikos&#8221;: Dividing the court in half by sex won&#8217;t ever make a difference because those who seek power aren&#8217;t interested in the welfare of the people. Also, there is no everywoman. There is no ERA largely because women don&#8217;t want it. Lefty types seem to be all green, all natural, except when it comes to gender issues: their extreme ideal is the idea of no gender at all, and they seem to think that any differences between the sexes are 100% nurture and 0% nature. The idea of 50-50 splits in any aspect of our existence is an illusion&#8211;it&#8217;s merely another variation of either-or thinking. Far from being &#8220;consigned&#8221; to the kitchen, it is now a luxury for the rich suburbanite to be economically able to choose to be a soccer/cookie-baking/home for the kids mom. The more things change, the more they stay the same. There will never be equality between the sexes because it is by definition impossible, not because &#8220;men just don&#8217;t get it&#8221;, etc. If you&#8217;d like to indulge in some speculation and/or fantasizing about manipulation of gender, may I suggest reading the brilliant (and not shrilly preachy!, deep sigh&#8230;) musings of Ursula K. Leguin; especially &#8220;The left Hand of Darkness&#8221;, and another volume of short stories called something like &#8220;The Birthday of the World&#8221;, published a few years ago. She must be great in bed, even at, or especially in, her seventies!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikos</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4745</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 04:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4745</guid>
		<description>cheesechowmain: Nina Totenberg reported near the end of Clinton&#039;s second term that O&#039;Connor had long considered retirement, but wanted a Republican to appoint her successor.  She also wanted her successor to be another woman.  So, she got half her wish.  
Isn&#039;t it astonishing that out of a population-base that&#039;s slightly more than 50% female, we&#039;re about to have a SCOTUS that&#039;s 89% male?  
But no, we don&#039;t need anything like an Equal Rights Amendment, because we&#039;re not a sexist society!
Wee!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cheesechowmain: Nina Totenberg reported near the end of Clinton&#8217;s second term that O&#8217;Connor had long considered retirement, but wanted a Republican to appoint her successor.  She also wanted her successor to be another woman.  So, she got half her wish.<br />
Isn&#8217;t it astonishing that out of a population-base that&#8217;s slightly more than 50% female, we&#8217;re about to have a SCOTUS that&#8217;s 89% male?<br />
But no, we don&#8217;t need anything like an Equal Rights Amendment, because we&#8217;re not a sexist society!<br />
Wee!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A little yellow bird</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4744</link>
		<dc:creator>A little yellow bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 04:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4744</guid>
		<description>Oh, and my dear satanic little shysters, if you could find it in your Grinchy, money-grubbing hearts, please hype the concept of jury nullification as an agency for change. People must stop being fed into the gaping maw of the prison construction/legislative/police and prison guard union-industrial complex for non-crimes: the sins of the flesh, such as doping, whoring, gambling, and pandering to sin. Can I please be a grownup someday? Argue that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and my dear satanic little shysters, if you could find it in your Grinchy, money-grubbing hearts, please hype the concept of jury nullification as an agency for change. People must stop being fed into the gaping maw of the prison construction/legislative/police and prison guard union-industrial complex for non-crimes: the sins of the flesh, such as doping, whoring, gambling, and pandering to sin. Can I please be a grownup someday? Argue that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A little yellow bird</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4742</link>
		<dc:creator>A little yellow bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 03:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4742</guid>
		<description>If my dire previous entry which Chrisopher, Wizard of OS happened to find entertaining, happens not to prove prescient, then hopefully Generation Alito will recognize how some arguments they are supposed to make are pre-framed, and therefore invalid; to wit: the gay marriage &quot;issue&quot;. To me, the issue is, why does the government interfere in any sort of marriage? The constitution has nothing to say whatever about such micromanagement. The constitution does, however, allow Alabama, let&#039;s say, to basically not allow openly declared homosexual relationships, and allows, say, New York to be a haven for such people. To the young woman who spoke about her focus on women&#039;s legal issues, there is absolutely no right to privacy in the constitution; but there is supposed to be safety from illegal search and seizure, absolute property rights (ahem, Kelo...), and freedom of association. BTW, here&#039;s an super cartoon on gay marriage from the New Yorker Magazine:  http://www.cartoonbank.com/product_details.asp?mscssid=8550JWP6F6738JJ1XE1E3G48QDUV17UD&amp;sitetype=1&amp;did=4&amp;sid=70986&amp;whichpage=1&amp;sortBy=popular&amp;keyword=eroded+institution&amp;section=cartoons</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If my dire previous entry which Chrisopher, Wizard of OS happened to find entertaining, happens not to prove prescient, then hopefully Generation Alito will recognize how some arguments they are supposed to make are pre-framed, and therefore invalid; to wit: the gay marriage &#8220;issue&#8221;. To me, the issue is, why does the government interfere in any sort of marriage? The constitution has nothing to say whatever about such micromanagement. The constitution does, however, allow Alabama, let&#8217;s say, to basically not allow openly declared homosexual relationships, and allows, say, New York to be a haven for such people. To the young woman who spoke about her focus on women&#8217;s legal issues, there is absolutely no right to privacy in the constitution; but there is supposed to be safety from illegal search and seizure, absolute property rights (ahem, Kelo&#8230;), and freedom of association. BTW, here&#8217;s an super cartoon on gay marriage from the New Yorker Magazine:  <a href="http://www.cartoonbank.com/product_details.asp?mscssid=8550JWP6F6738JJ1XE1E3G48QDUV17UD&amp;sitetype=1&amp;did=4&amp;sid=70986&amp;whichpage=1&amp;sortBy=popular&amp;keyword=eroded+institution&amp;section=cartoons" rel="nofollow">http://www.cartoonbank.com/product_details.asp?mscssid=8550JWP6F6738JJ1XE1E3G48QDUV17UD&amp;sitetype=1&amp;did=4&amp;sid=70986&amp;whichpage=1&amp;sortBy=popular&amp;keyword=eroded+institution&amp;section=cartoons</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Potter</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4737</link>
		<dc:creator>Potter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4737</guid>
		<description>Hopefully the country will eventually will puke this whole bunch of scoundrels out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully the country will eventually will puke this whole bunch of scoundrels out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A little yellow bird</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4736</link>
		<dc:creator>A little yellow bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4736</guid>
		<description>The battles these young &#039;uns&#039;ll be fighting will be ground wars all over the world for the Bush Dynasty after the economy finishes tanking and we finish becoming the Fourth Reich.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The battles these young &#8216;uns&#8217;ll be fighting will be ground wars all over the world for the Bush Dynasty after the economy finishes tanking and we finish becoming the Fourth Reich.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fconte</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/generation-alito/comment-page-1/#comment-4735</link>
		<dc:creator>fconte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=398#comment-4735</guid>
		<description>Wow what a lineup!  I hope the fellow from the Federalist Society gets a fair hearing. 

I hear a lot of pablum about &quot;defendent&#039;s rights&quot; and I&#039;m sure I&#039;ll get an earful on &quot;choice&quot; both worthy of discussion but not dominating the whole of it. What about real individuals rights? What about the right be judged on your character not your skin color, your right to own a gun and self defense, your right to hold onto your property and keep it away from greedy city planners with crazy notions of eminent domain. What wouild Alito do about Kelo that atrocity that was wrougth by a treasonous Souter? I&#039;m all ears.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow what a lineup!  I hope the fellow from the Federalist Society gets a fair hearing. </p>
<p>I hear a lot of pablum about &#8220;defendent&#8217;s rights&#8221; and I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll get an earful on &#8220;choice&#8221; both worthy of discussion but not dominating the whole of it. What about real individuals rights? What about the right be judged on your character not your skin color, your right to own a gun and self defense, your right to hold onto your property and keep it away from greedy city planners with crazy notions of eminent domain. What wouild Alito do about Kelo that atrocity that was wrougth by a treasonous Souter? I&#8217;m all ears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
