<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Micromanaging vs. Oversight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radioopensource.org/micromanaging-vs-oversight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/micromanaging-vs-oversight/</link>
	<description>Christopher Lydon in conversation on arts, ideas and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:09:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Dunbar</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/micromanaging-vs-oversight/#comment-82741</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Dunbar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 23:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=868#comment-82741</guid>
		<description>Allison Somer mentioned an interesting aggregator called me-merandum (?).  Is there a link to that?  I&#039;m curious to see if it could help my information habit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allison Somer mentioned an interesting aggregator called me-merandum (?).  Is there a link to that?  I&#8217;m curious to see if it could help my information habit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chefhick</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/micromanaging-vs-oversight/#comment-82740</link>
		<dc:creator>chefhick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 03:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=868#comment-82740</guid>
		<description>Chris,

not often do you let comments slide by you but Mr Turner, like others i have heard on other shows, gives Bush 43 a pass on invading Iraq becuse of the resolution for regime change during the Clinton years.  It is one thing to vote to promote efforts to remove a dictator from power and another to drop bombs on the population and send soldiers to die for that cause. We had  regime change in the USSR without that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>not often do you let comments slide by you but Mr Turner, like others i have heard on other shows, gives Bush 43 a pass on invading Iraq becuse of the resolution for regime change during the Clinton years.  It is one thing to vote to promote efforts to remove a dictator from power and another to drop bombs on the population and send soldiers to die for that cause. We had  regime change in the USSR without that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EricPA</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/micromanaging-vs-oversight/#comment-82739</link>
		<dc:creator>EricPA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 19:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=868#comment-82739</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t wish to hear only people who agree with me.  But for &quot;professor&quot; Turner to imply that the only reason anyone opposes the Iraq invasion is because we&#039;re &quot;misinformed&quot; ... well, them&#039;s fightin&#039; words to someone who is confident that he pays more attention to national and international affairs than 95% of this country&#039;s citizens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t wish to hear only people who agree with me.  But for &#8220;professor&#8221; Turner to imply that the only reason anyone opposes the Iraq invasion is because we&#8217;re &#8220;misinformed&#8221; &#8230; well, them&#8217;s fightin&#8217; words to someone who is confident that he pays more attention to national and international affairs than 95% of this country&#8217;s citizens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cerebrocrat</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/micromanaging-vs-oversight/#comment-82738</link>
		<dc:creator>cerebrocrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 04:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=868#comment-82738</guid>
		<description>Open Source is generally some of the highest quality public debate around, particularly in its medium.  So I have to resist taking it personally when I&#039;m subjected to such flagrantly dishonest dissembling as Turner was up to.



I don&#039;t have any problem hearing from conservatives, war supporters, etc., and I understand that conflict makes good radio, but it&#039;s hard for me to understand how the debate is served by giving air to someone who spends as much airtime as he can hog, telling outrageous lies as fast as he can.



We have to do better than this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Open Source is generally some of the highest quality public debate around, particularly in its medium.  So I have to resist taking it personally when I&#8217;m subjected to such flagrantly dishonest dissembling as Turner was up to.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have any problem hearing from conservatives, war supporters, etc., and I understand that conflict makes good radio, but it&#8217;s hard for me to understand how the debate is served by giving air to someone who spends as much airtime as he can hog, telling outrageous lies as fast as he can.</p>
<p>We have to do better than this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hurley</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/micromanaging-vs-oversight/#comment-82737</link>
		<dc:creator>hurley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=868#comment-82737</guid>
		<description>tbrucia says: As always, interesting that people use the word â€˜weâ€™ interchangably with â€˜the US governmentâ€™ â€” as if American (outside the Beltway) interests were the same as Federal Government (inside the Beltway) interestsâ€¦



I agree, though I&#039;ve made the error myself. Another instance of linguistic kudzoo along the lines of &quot;private contractor&quot; instead of mercenary. What business do journalists, in their capacity as journaliists, have referring to themselves in the collective patriotic &quot;we,&quot; annealing themselves to the very people and processes they&#039;re supposed to maintain (think Izzy Stone) a critical distance from. Difficult to be simultaneously obsequious and presumptuous, but flunkies like Kagan (why oh why was he on the micromanaging show, except to afford Chris the great line &quot;the take off your sunglasses doctrine&quot;...) and others nevertheless manage it remarkably well.

Thanks for your point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tbrucia says: As always, interesting that people use the word â€˜weâ€™ interchangably with â€˜the US governmentâ€™ â€” as if American (outside the Beltway) interests were the same as Federal Government (inside the Beltway) interestsâ€¦</p>
<p>I agree, though I&#8217;ve made the error myself. Another instance of linguistic kudzoo along the lines of &#8220;private contractor&#8221; instead of mercenary. What business do journalists, in their capacity as journaliists, have referring to themselves in the collective patriotic &#8220;we,&#8221; annealing themselves to the very people and processes they&#8217;re supposed to maintain (think Izzy Stone) a critical distance from. Difficult to be simultaneously obsequious and presumptuous, but flunkies like Kagan (why oh why was he on the micromanaging show, except to afford Chris the great line &#8220;the take off your sunglasses doctrine&#8221;&#8230;) and others nevertheless manage it remarkably well.</p>
<p>Thanks for your point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tbrucia</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/micromanaging-vs-oversight/#comment-82736</link>
		<dc:creator>tbrucia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 14:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=868#comment-82736</guid>
		<description>As always, interesting that people use the word &#039;we&#039; interchangably with &#039;the US government&#039; -- as if American (outside the Beltway) interests were the same as Federal Government (inside the Beltway) interests...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always, interesting that people use the word &#8216;we&#8217; interchangably with &#8216;the US government&#8217; &#8212; as if American (outside the Beltway) interests were the same as Federal Government (inside the Beltway) interests&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djdehner</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/micromanaging-vs-oversight/#comment-82735</link>
		<dc:creator>djdehner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=868#comment-82735</guid>
		<description>Why has no one suggested the possibility that we cannot move forward without global support? It seems more than likely to me, especially considering the road blocks to peace in this civil war, that only a multi-national effort will secure anything but disaster for this once sovereign nation. And, in order to dialogue with religious factions, you need to have leaders who are sensative to religious issues as well as understanding those who confuse religion with real estate.



As unbelieveable as it seems, we need to at least discuss the power of an apology from the current administration for getting us into this mess unprepaired to get us out. Then, perhaps, other nations may be inclined to come to our aid. There is real power in truth and reconciliation, as proved in South Africa, and we have much to admit and be reconciled to.



David Dehner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why has no one suggested the possibility that we cannot move forward without global support? It seems more than likely to me, especially considering the road blocks to peace in this civil war, that only a multi-national effort will secure anything but disaster for this once sovereign nation. And, in order to dialogue with religious factions, you need to have leaders who are sensative to religious issues as well as understanding those who confuse religion with real estate.</p>
<p>As unbelieveable as it seems, we need to at least discuss the power of an apology from the current administration for getting us into this mess unprepaired to get us out. Then, perhaps, other nations may be inclined to come to our aid. There is real power in truth and reconciliation, as proved in South Africa, and we have much to admit and be reconciled to.</p>
<p>David Dehner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joneden</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/micromanaging-vs-oversight/#comment-82734</link>
		<dc:creator>joneden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=868#comment-82734</guid>
		<description>Thank you SOURCES  for putting it so well. I also found listening to that wing nut Taylor profoundly disturbing--into the time warp as you put it.



The American people have two choices here. We can plan to fight forever in the Middle East or choose to come home without VICTORY--there are a billion Muslims  who are willing to assure that this is the way it is going to be. So do we want to deal with this unpalatable truth sooner or later. Clearly it is in Bush&#039;s personal interest for it to be later, (and then he can blame the failure on his successor.) For  the overwhelming majority of the rest of us, it needs to be sooner.



Baker--and the group of realists he met with--set down a road map for ending this national night mare, and I hope Congress will see to it that we get on that road. When you have  the oversight, you have the ultimate authority. When those charged with managing seem to insist  on making bad decisions, those with the oversight become the DECIDER of last resort.



I think what is happening now is evidence that we did learn from the Vietnam error--we learned that accepting defeat can be our best option. Hopefully after this war, we will move up the learning curve, and raise the congressional bar for getting into these kinds of no win entanglements, so that never again will our collective national stupidity be a basis for spreading our violence around the globe.



Jon

Connecting the Dots: From human behavior to ecosystem collapse

http://StudentsForTheEarth.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you SOURCES  for putting it so well. I also found listening to that wing nut Taylor profoundly disturbing&#8211;into the time warp as you put it.</p>
<p>The American people have two choices here. We can plan to fight forever in the Middle East or choose to come home without VICTORY&#8211;there are a billion Muslims  who are willing to assure that this is the way it is going to be. So do we want to deal with this unpalatable truth sooner or later. Clearly it is in Bush&#8217;s personal interest for it to be later, (and then he can blame the failure on his successor.) For  the overwhelming majority of the rest of us, it needs to be sooner.</p>
<p>Baker&#8211;and the group of realists he met with&#8211;set down a road map for ending this national night mare, and I hope Congress will see to it that we get on that road. When you have  the oversight, you have the ultimate authority. When those charged with managing seem to insist  on making bad decisions, those with the oversight become the DECIDER of last resort.</p>
<p>I think what is happening now is evidence that we did learn from the Vietnam error&#8211;we learned that accepting defeat can be our best option. Hopefully after this war, we will move up the learning curve, and raise the congressional bar for getting into these kinds of no win entanglements, so that never again will our collective national stupidity be a basis for spreading our violence around the globe.</p>
<p>Jon</p>
<p>Connecting the Dots: From human behavior to ecosystem collapse</p>
<p><a  href="http://StudentsForTheEarth.org" rel="nofollow">http://StudentsForTheEarth.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: griffy2000</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/micromanaging-vs-oversight/#comment-82733</link>
		<dc:creator>griffy2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=868#comment-82733</guid>
		<description>Professor Taylor, and others, continually talk about &quot;our nation&#039;s interest&quot; in regards to wherever (Iraq, Vietnam, etc) we might be involved militarily. When will we acknowledge that our interests are not the average Iraqi&#039;s interests. It&#039;s not our country, it&#039;s theirs. Oh, and did I hear him say VietMANese?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Professor Taylor, and others, continually talk about &#8220;our nation&#8217;s interest&#8221; in regards to wherever (Iraq, Vietnam, etc) we might be involved militarily. When will we acknowledge that our interests are not the average Iraqi&#8217;s interests. It&#8217;s not our country, it&#8217;s theirs. Oh, and did I hear him say VietMANese?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nother</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/micromanaging-vs-oversight/#comment-82732</link>
		<dc:creator>nother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 06:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=868#comment-82732</guid>
		<description>OCP/CCM, Where the hell ya been, was worried about ya.  I saw Jazzman&#039;s post but I didn&#039;t really get it till now (I&#039;m a little slow!) We&#039;ve been taking ourselves a little too serious around here, so it&#039;s grrreat to have ya back!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OCP/CCM, Where the hell ya been, was worried about ya.  I saw Jazzman&#8217;s post but I didn&#8217;t really get it till now (I&#8217;m a little slow!) We&#8217;ve been taking ourselves a little too serious around here, so it&#8217;s grrreat to have ya back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

