<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pakistan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radioopensource.org/pakistan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/pakistan/</link>
	<description>Christopher Lydon in conversation on arts, ideas and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:52:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pakistan Calling Cards &#187; Open Source Blog Archive Pakistan</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/pakistan/#comment-68442</link>
		<dc:creator>Pakistan Calling Cards &#187; Open Source Blog Archive Pakistan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 23:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/2005/08/01/pakistan/#comment-68442</guid>
		<description>[...] chive    Pakistan  	Filed under: General &#8212; Admin @ 12:54 am   	  	  		Open Source    Blog Archive    Pakistan Pakistan is an ally. Al Quaeda hiding out in the mountains? Paki [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] chive    Pakistan  	Filed under: General &#8212; Admin @ 12:54 am   	  	  		Open Source    Blog Archive    Pakistan Pakistan is an ally. Al Quaeda hiding out in the mountains? Paki [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La tartine gourmande &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Tartelettes Ã  l&#8217;orange - Orange Tartlets</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/pakistan/#comment-68441</link>
		<dc:creator>La tartine gourmande &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Tartelettes Ã  l&#8217;orange - Orange Tartlets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/2005/08/01/pakistan/#comment-68441</guid>
		<description>[...]  friend Brendan is funny, witty, lively and recently I just heard he can cook! The amazing Brendan works at Radio Open Source with Christopher Lyndon, and a bunch of great people like David [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  friend Brendan is funny, witty, lively and recently I just heard he can cook! The amazing Brendan works at Radio Open Source with Christopher Lyndon, and a bunch of great people like David [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikos</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/pakistan/#comment-68440</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 07:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/2005/08/01/pakistan/#comment-68440</guid>
		<description>sidewalker wrote: &quot;I thought this show, like the Sharon show, was too closed sourced&quot;.



I could be wrong (wouldn&#039;t be the first time, nor the last), but it seems to me that YOU&#039;re the &#039;open source&#039; (as are the rest of us) that Chris, Brendan, Katherine, (and their newbie interns) name in the show&#039;s title.



Brendan?  (I KNOW you&#039;re reading this!)  Is this so, or am I mistaken (yet again)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sidewalker wrote: &#8220;I thought this show, like the Sharon show, was too closed sourced&#8221;.</p>
<p>I could be wrong (wouldn&#8217;t be the first time, nor the last), but it seems to me that YOU&#8217;re the &#8216;open source&#8217; (as are the rest of us) that Chris, Brendan, Katherine, (and their newbie interns) name in the show&#8217;s title.</p>
<p>Brendan?  (I KNOW you&#8217;re reading this!)  Is this so, or am I mistaken (yet again)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidewalker</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/pakistan/#comment-68439</link>
		<dc:creator>sidewalker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 08:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/2005/08/01/pakistan/#comment-68439</guid>
		<description>A couple of comments on the show and the discussion. First I thought this show, like the Sharon show, was too closed sourced. I&#039;m not seeking a left-right type debate, god forbid, but a greater variety of perspectives to open the discussion. In the Pakistan show, it seemed that Christine Fair was mostly an apologist or disciple of Ambassador Husain Haqqani, though she did, in fairness, expand on his ideas. Why was there not an Islamic point of view or two represented (since there are many Islamic discourses)? I could be asking for too much, since I do not know exactly what goes into producing a segment. Also, in a way, this discussion board does allow for additional points of view. Hmmm... Second, since this is an American-based production, it will inevitably be at this time all about the war (of) terror, Osama, and Islam, but there is much more about Pakistan that would be intriguing to explore without having to always come back to US geo-politics.

As for some points raised in the discussion, I would agree with Syed that the &quot;Mysterious East&quot; approach should be a thing of the past. I might suggest that it seems more mysterious that an &quot;informed&quot; US public (not one brainwashed in Islamic schools!) and many of their checked and balanced political representatives rapidly endorsed an illegal war in Iraq with little debate just because the president got on the TV and talked tough. Oops! Sorry for the Occidentalism. Also, Umkumar suggests that the &quot;whole issue of Pakistan is complex.&quot; I thought Pakistan was a country, a society, a diaspora, part of the global political economy, etc.; not an issue to be discussed and wrapped up in some nice box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of comments on the show and the discussion. First I thought this show, like the Sharon show, was too closed sourced. I&#8217;m not seeking a left-right type debate, god forbid, but a greater variety of perspectives to open the discussion. In the Pakistan show, it seemed that Christine Fair was mostly an apologist or disciple of Ambassador Husain Haqqani, though she did, in fairness, expand on his ideas. Why was there not an Islamic point of view or two represented (since there are many Islamic discourses)? I could be asking for too much, since I do not know exactly what goes into producing a segment. Also, in a way, this discussion board does allow for additional points of view. Hmmm&#8230; Second, since this is an American-based production, it will inevitably be at this time all about the war (of) terror, Osama, and Islam, but there is much more about Pakistan that would be intriguing to explore without having to always come back to US geo-politics.</p>
<p>As for some points raised in the discussion, I would agree with Syed that the &#8220;Mysterious East&#8221; approach should be a thing of the past. I might suggest that it seems more mysterious that an &#8220;informed&#8221; US public (not one brainwashed in Islamic schools!) and many of their checked and balanced political representatives rapidly endorsed an illegal war in Iraq with little debate just because the president got on the TV and talked tough. Oops! Sorry for the Occidentalism. Also, Umkumar suggests that the &#8220;whole issue of Pakistan is complex.&#8221; I thought Pakistan was a country, a society, a diaspora, part of the global political economy, etc.; not an issue to be discussed and wrapped up in some nice box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Potter</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/pakistan/#comment-68438</link>
		<dc:creator>Potter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/2005/08/01/pakistan/#comment-68438</guid>
		<description>One &quot;issue&quot; that did not rise much from the &quot;murk&quot; was why Pakistan ( and okay India as well) will not let go of Kashmir, another place on Earth of wondrous beauty threatened by war. Why wouldn&#039;t an independent Kashmir be better for all concerned?  Training  camps set up  for fighters to go to Kashmir provide fighters/terrorists for other purposes as well as was mentioned. ( Remember our boy John Walker Lindh was offered the option to go to fight in Kashmir by Bin Laden&#039;s men.)



I recommend listening to the clip above of blogger Omer Alvie. I followed the link to his web site where to my astonishment he has issued a long apology about it having to do with his shortcomings that I could not detect.  Apparently the interview went on for an hour but here we have only a few minutes of it which are very worthwhile. We need more such bridges,



The exchange above between Shaman and Syed from this summer is good.



If Pakistanis do not hate us only our government&#039;s foreign policy, then they are not holding us accountable for putting our government in office. Do they understand the imperfections of our system  or are they judging us on the imperfections of their own? It always amazes me to hear how others like us but hate our government.



Perhaps If they hated us all more it might be better for us ( we would care more, ask more questions).  Remember after 9/11 all those questions that were being asked and answered,  &quot;Why Do They Hate Us?&quot; and serious articles about &quot;empire&quot;, in the media?  Gone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One &#8220;issue&#8221; that did not rise much from the &#8220;murk&#8221; was why Pakistan ( and okay India as well) will not let go of Kashmir, another place on Earth of wondrous beauty threatened by war. Why wouldn&#8217;t an independent Kashmir be better for all concerned?  Training  camps set up  for fighters to go to Kashmir provide fighters/terrorists for other purposes as well as was mentioned. ( Remember our boy John Walker Lindh was offered the option to go to fight in Kashmir by Bin Laden&#8217;s men.)</p>
<p>I recommend listening to the clip above of blogger Omer Alvie. I followed the link to his web site where to my astonishment he has issued a long apology about it having to do with his shortcomings that I could not detect.  Apparently the interview went on for an hour but here we have only a few minutes of it which are very worthwhile. We need more such bridges,</p>
<p>The exchange above between Shaman and Syed from this summer is good.</p>
<p>If Pakistanis do not hate us only our government&#8217;s foreign policy, then they are not holding us accountable for putting our government in office. Do they understand the imperfections of our system  or are they judging us on the imperfections of their own? It always amazes me to hear how others like us but hate our government.</p>
<p>Perhaps If they hated us all more it might be better for us ( we would care more, ask more questions).  Remember after 9/11 all those questions that were being asked and answered,  &#8220;Why Do They Hate Us?&#8221; and serious articles about &#8220;empire&#8221;, in the media?  Gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tbrucia</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/pakistan/#comment-68437</link>
		<dc:creator>tbrucia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 03:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/2005/08/01/pakistan/#comment-68437</guid>
		<description>I find it very weird that (many) Americans are puzzled that Pakistanis are upset about the missile attack in Damadola...  Imagine that the Pakistan government discovered a group of Indian extremists in Greensburg, Pennsylvania.  Imagine that they decided to &#039;take them out&#039; because this group was planning to assassinate the Pakistani ambassador to the United Nations.  And imagine that the Pakistani government decided to use a bomb to kill the &#039;terrorist cell&#039; in Pennsylvania.  Now imagine that it decided not to tell the American government that it was launching this &#039;preemptive&#039; attack.  And, finally, imagine that a dozen kids coming home from grade school, a crossing guard, and several moms standing on their front porches were killed by the Pakistani bomb.  Would Americans be upset?  I doubt that would even come close to describing the public&#039;s feelings.  And I doubt reassurances that the kids and moms were just &#039;collateral damage&#039;, accidentally caught up in the destruction of a dangerous terrorist cell would do much to quell the anti-Pakistani clamor. -- Yes, I find it &lt;i&gt;very &lt;/i&gt; weird that (many) Americans are puzzled that Pakistanis are upset about the missile attack in Damadola.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it very weird that (many) Americans are puzzled that Pakistanis are upset about the missile attack in Damadola&#8230;  Imagine that the Pakistan government discovered a group of Indian extremists in Greensburg, Pennsylvania.  Imagine that they decided to &#8216;take them out&#8217; because this group was planning to assassinate the Pakistani ambassador to the United Nations.  And imagine that the Pakistani government decided to use a bomb to kill the &#8216;terrorist cell&#8217; in Pennsylvania.  Now imagine that it decided not to tell the American government that it was launching this &#8216;preemptive&#8217; attack.  And, finally, imagine that a dozen kids coming home from grade school, a crossing guard, and several moms standing on their front porches were killed by the Pakistani bomb.  Would Americans be upset?  I doubt that would even come close to describing the public&#8217;s feelings.  And I doubt reassurances that the kids and moms were just &#8216;collateral damage&#8217;, accidentally caught up in the destruction of a dangerous terrorist cell would do much to quell the anti-Pakistani clamor. &#8212; Yes, I find it <i>very </i> weird that (many) Americans are puzzled that Pakistanis are upset about the missile attack in Damadola.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iFaqeer</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/pakistan/#comment-68436</link>
		<dc:creator>iFaqeer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/2005/08/01/pakistan/#comment-68436</guid>
		<description>In conclusion:



One thing I have to say is that Christine Fair keeps complimenting Hussain Haqqani, but the one thing that jumped out of listening to the show is her grasp and clarity on Pakistan and its society and politics. Kudos! In particular:



Ms. Fair&#039;s point about how many sitting members of the National Assembly are US citizens and Green Card holders needs investigating. Maybe we can put a list together at WikiPakistan [http://Pakistan.WikiCities.com], for example....



&quot;Opposition of choice&quot;. Love the phrase Ms. Fair uses for the &quot;Islamists&quot;.



Shge even brang up the Uighurs and China. That&#039;s actually one thing I&#039;d like to hear more details about how that plays out in the region. Or is that too arcane an issue?



On other issues:



One thing most Pakistanis and people in the diaspora don&#039;t realize that Musharraf has appointed a former head of the country&#039;s major intelligence agency to head a re-write of educational curriculums. I mean, even if you love the ISI and intelligence agencies, what kind of citizen wants an intelligence agency-type person guide curriculums?



On Omar Alvie: &quot;You don&#039;t expect it to happen.&quot; Huh? What? Hasn&#039;t this happened before? Come on! Let&#039;s keep it real here, huh?



His point about the role of government and about America is a necessary point. And bears saying. Good choice on who to quote, there, Chris and team.



Great program! Wow, that went fast!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In conclusion:</p>
<p>One thing I have to say is that Christine Fair keeps complimenting Hussain Haqqani, but the one thing that jumped out of listening to the show is her grasp and clarity on Pakistan and its society and politics. Kudos! In particular:</p>
<p>Ms. Fair&#8217;s point about how many sitting members of the National Assembly are US citizens and Green Card holders needs investigating. Maybe we can put a list together at WikiPakistan [http://Pakistan.WikiCities.com], for example&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8220;Opposition of choice&#8221;. Love the phrase Ms. Fair uses for the &#8220;Islamists&#8221;.</p>
<p>Shge even brang up the Uighurs and China. That&#8217;s actually one thing I&#8217;d like to hear more details about how that plays out in the region. Or is that too arcane an issue?</p>
<p>On other issues:</p>
<p>One thing most Pakistanis and people in the diaspora don&#8217;t realize that Musharraf has appointed a former head of the country&#8217;s major intelligence agency to head a re-write of educational curriculums. I mean, even if you love the ISI and intelligence agencies, what kind of citizen wants an intelligence agency-type person guide curriculums?</p>
<p>On Omar Alvie: &#8220;You don&#8217;t expect it to happen.&#8221; Huh? What? Hasn&#8217;t this happened before? Come on! Let&#8217;s keep it real here, huh?</p>
<p>His point about the role of government and about America is a necessary point. And bears saying. Good choice on who to quote, there, Chris and team.</p>
<p>Great program! Wow, that went fast!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iFaqeer</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/pakistan/#comment-68435</link>
		<dc:creator>iFaqeer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/2005/08/01/pakistan/#comment-68435</guid>
		<description>11%. That&#039;s the figure I was waiting to hear. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>11%. That&#8217;s the figure I was waiting to hear. <img src='http://www.radioopensource.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iFaqeer</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/pakistan/#comment-68434</link>
		<dc:creator>iFaqeer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/2005/08/01/pakistan/#comment-68434</guid>
		<description>Kudos for Ms. Fair saying that &quot;In Pakistan, one can be anti-Musharraf, anti-US and anti-Islamist&quot; at the same time. And who speaks for them? That&#039;s what I meant by asking who would speak for the average Pakistani. Good to see that perspective being brought out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos for Ms. Fair saying that &#8220;In Pakistan, one can be anti-Musharraf, anti-US and anti-Islamist&#8221; at the same time. And who speaks for them? That&#8217;s what I meant by asking who would speak for the average Pakistani. Good to see that perspective being brought out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iFaqeer</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/pakistan/#comment-68433</link>
		<dc:creator>iFaqeer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/2005/08/01/pakistan/#comment-68433</guid>
		<description>Thoughts:



Good description of FATA&#039;s legal status by Ms. Fair.



The back story in support for extremist &quot;Islamists&quot; is that BOTH the Pakistani and the American governments backed those extremists during the Soviet period. I mean, come on! Gulbuddin Hekmatyar already had a record of throwing acid in unveiled female faces.



About puppet regimes, everyone&#039;s been trying to put puppet regimes in that region going back to the Soviets, the Americans, the British...dare I go back further?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thoughts:</p>
<p>Good description of FATA&#8217;s legal status by Ms. Fair.</p>
<p>The back story in support for extremist &#8220;Islamists&#8221; is that BOTH the Pakistani and the American governments backed those extremists during the Soviet period. I mean, come on! Gulbuddin Hekmatyar already had a record of throwing acid in unveiled female faces.</p>
<p>About puppet regimes, everyone&#8217;s been trying to put puppet regimes in that region going back to the Soviets, the Americans, the British&#8230;dare I go back further?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

