Comments on: Ralph Nader's Flight of Fantasy

By: Aquifer

Aquifer — Tue, 18 Jan 2011 01:29:00 +0000

i just came upon this interview – having “rediscovered” this site and it is interesting to listen to it a year later. I wonder, in light of all that has transpired in that year, whether Chris would still be looking so much for “compassion” for Obama …

As for Ralph, I am a 4 time Nader voter (started in ’96, after Clinton pushed NAFTA), and would do it again. I have read this book and like the step by step “how to” scenario. There are a couple of problems i have with it, however. One is the rather, in my view, naive notion that any of these folks would actually put a lot of money into undermining the system that has made, and continues to make, them all the money they have. Ain’t gonna happen, IMO. But the other basic problem i have with it is the assumption that, unless we do get this kind of cash infusion, we wouldn’t be able to do any of it. It almost seems that he is buying into the “can’t win” meme that has been such a powerful tool in defeating him and any other 3rd party that runs – I would really like to ask him about this …..

By: Mike Lebednik

Mike Lebednik — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:28:15 +0000

I just listened to the Chris Lydon/Ralph Nader discussion on 12/15, but was very impressed with Ralph’s responses to Chris’ ‘but seriously’ challenges to Nader’s premises, at least as Lydon saw them. What a combination of sharp wit, knowledge, and rollicking sense of humor came to the fore in this exchange! Bravo to R. N. for not getting stymied amidst thought-provoking challenges. Let’s have more of this sort of dialogue, well-informed, humanitarian, unflappable!

By: Laura Geraghty

Laura Geraghty — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:35:45 +0000

It’s crazy to blame Nader for Bush winning. Had Gore espoused ANY of Nader’s progressive platforms, which Nader openly and loudly invited him or any candidate to do during the campaign, then GORE would have gotten those votes. But he (Gore) chose to run on his corporate approved platform. Nader simply gave a voice to the voiceless. Nader repeatedly said “take my supporters – they’ll come to you if you embrace these platforms!” Gore did not.

And by now it is pretty clear that both Republicrats and Demopublicans are the same as far as serving corporations before people.

By: Frank Aragona

Frank Aragona — Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:46:16 +0000

Ralph’s critique is discussed in the context of transition culture, permaculture, and a silent revolution on the Agroinnovations Podcast.

http://tr.im/F591

By: Saoirse

Saoirse — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:27:33 +0000

Ralph quoted some minor, not well known ancient Greek philosopher on the subject of freedom in his reading before the Miami Book Fair yesterday, 11/15/9. The gist of his message? That freedom is political power.

“Freedom is always and exclusively freedom for the one who thinks differently.”

Rosa Luxemburg, revolutionary

Freedom is not political power, Ralph. Shame on you.

For those of you fretting over the alleged health care fix (which has been debated for the majority of the lives of those of you who, demographics tell us, have been alive, no thanks to Ralph), you need to understand that the price-fixed system of health care rationing has underpinned decades of bioslavery. I’m not just speaking about Tuskegee, or the Philadelphia Survivor’s Network or the atomic veterans. I’m talking about a private industry-government collusion that has, according to their own plans and words, given us disaster medicine (a la Naomi Klein’s thesis in “Disaster Capitalism”) in which no disease will ever be cured (such as diabetes, which researchers know is caused by a virus but no doctor uses antivirals to treat it because the market for blood glucose monitors and other peripheral treatments is HUGE). And those curious epidemics that are beginning to crop up with the regularity of seasonal catastrophes? Ditto. All of the facts proving these things are in the public domain but neither Ralph (a proponent of more, not less, government in health care) acknowledges them. Not Noam Chomsky, either (who’s paycheck is signed by one of the oldest defense contractors in the country, one that has a “secret” lab in Lincoln, MA), nor Howard Zinn. They don’t talk about the biowarfare to which we have all been subjected because they’re not paid to tell you the truth about your government, and they know what will happen to them if they do. I’ve tried to talk to each of them about the very real, very provable, very explicit type of AIDS from which I have suffered and NONE of them has given me the time of day. This is fascism, folks. And a fascist government is not going to fix itself.

By: mjohn

mjohn — Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:59:09 +0000

I would post $2,000.

By: Antman

Antman — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:41:09 +0000

To answer the question posed at the end of the program. I would post 1,000$ dollars to Naders save capitalism plan once he gained 50% of the funding, plus I would volunteer with the canvasing. But it has to be Nader in charge to ensure that the attempt follows through with the original ideals.

By: Jeff Tyrakowski

Jeff Tyrakowski — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:33:04 +0000

I listened with a sympathetic ear to this conversation. However, I am constantly surprised at how willing people are to vilify insurance and pharmaceutical companies, while absolving physicians – by far the wealthiest occupational group in the country – of fault. It is certainly true that insurers outside of not-for-profit Massachusetts get away with outrageous behavior. But it is also true that our insurers act as a pass-through to fund the local hospital industry. Physicians are the willing beneficiaries of this arrangement. Among the many things we need to accomplish as a society is the maturity to take our physical, spiritual and financial health in-hand, and start having honest conversations about how we’re going to change who gets paid what. The cult of the physician-God needs to end.

By: Potter

Potter — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 20:30:14 +0000

RN: We have hit a stone wall — one reason I ran for President three times. Congress has shut down. Washington is corporate-occupied territory. That’s the dystopia on the ground… Between that real life dystopia of the progressive liberal intelligentsia and their world, and their least-worst voting for the Democrats over the Republicans and never pulling the Democrats in their direction — between that and my practical utopia I’ll take my proposal as more realistic.

Will Ralph Nader ever admit his fatal error? Will he go on ad nauseum justifying it? Yes he’s right- what he says now is right. And it’s not insight anymore either. Chris it’s not intuitive, not so mysterious anymore. It’s more common knowledge and people are angry. It’s taken a long time to sink in deeper and wider. It’s a shame though that Nader lost his voice, his voice is not out there, his voice cannot be heard out there. My husband’s words: he’s disqualified himself. He is STILL saying that there is no difference between progressive Democrats and Republicans- or if he is not saying that, he’s saying he is angry at those liberal progressives who voted for the least-worst, angry at us for not voting for him.

Chris I did not listen but just read the bit of transcript above. I probably will listen- but it’s also going to be heart-breaking. He coulda’ been a contenda’. Now. Now that so many more are awakened, he even could have been working on this idea of his. But like Icarus, he melted his wings.

By: Potter

Potter — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:14:41 +0000

Hello Shaman-

You make a good point. Change one thing in history and everything else has to change. And it’s possibly true that if SO MUCH damage had not been done we would not have Obama. Two things ( or more) about that: I don’t know what we have in Obama yet, nor if he would not also have risen and appealed in any case after Gore. And you can decide if the damage done was worth it. I doubt it. Also if Nader’s issue is unfettered capitalism-and I agree about that- what was the best way to get at it? Nader had big ideas about himself I am afraid, There was never any way that he could have won the presidency. In my eyes he was only a spoiler in the service of his issue. I agree with his issue. I don’t agree that he did his issue any justice…. as you can see. And he negated himself.

That Bush is or will be a footnote to history is small consolation. And he may not be a footnote for the damage he has done. He will be notorious.

One argument that I can agree with that has not been made is that things had to get very bad before they could improve. Nader helped that along by helping Bush to win. I suppose you could also say that Al Gore would not have been able to flower with his global warming campaign. But I also think how much and how much earlier he might have moved us along as President in that area alone. Don’t forget also he was against the Iraq invasion.

I do hope things will improve with Obama even though they don’t seem to be improving as fast and radically as some would like. And they don’t seem to be improving much with regard to corporatism/money interests running this country more than it’s citizens.

Be well,best wishes- I do remember you from the “old days”.