Forget “imminent danger” from WMD, forget “spreading democracy”, or whatever we’re saying the reasons for going to war are – just tell us how much we spent, and what have we got to show for the cash today?

“We spent XYZ billion, but now we’ve got a second secure supplier of crude oil, which we can use as an advantage in negotiations with saudi suppliers, and this is worth QRS”

Or

“The cost of a financial instrument on wall street for providing a guaranteed supply of oil for 10 years is ABC. The invasion of Iraq secured a supply which is worth XYZ to our economy”.

One would think the citizens of the world would start realizing that essentially all the world’s savagery, misery, blood shed and violent death among innocent people of the world, by far the major victims, is the result of government action on the behalf of a miniscule fraction of the world’s population. One would think people would begin to boycott any and all government agencies not directly involved in creating friendly relations with their own citizens and all others. Only government actions with one’s own agreement should be funded or otherwise supported by each citizen. Earmarked tax payments are the only meaningful vote anyone has in the behavior of their government. It matters not whom the government functionaries are. It is time to wake up and take responsibility for one’s own government, environment and circumstances of government actions affecting the lives of people by being responsible to whom one provides the means to undertake unwanted actions. A government not engaged in making friends for the citizenry instead of making enemies should be starved out of office.

How about a show asking tax paying people why they pay their governments to make enemies for them instead of making friends for them. If the government is making their lives more difficult and worrisome, why do they give them money with which to do it? Why not give to the agencies of government which one perceives as making life more fulfilling with peace of mind? Let the other agencies get paid by their advocates or do without. Such a show should be entertaining to hear people trying to make sense of the reverse. And there are some who will try.

Well it is a massive task, so who else should handle it: The Iraqis alone? Minority owned businesses? Small companies?

The amounts of money are massive considered alone, but how massive when compared to the magnitude of the task? Or the oil revenue available? Or the lost productivity of the Saddam years?

And no doubt the lack of oversight is stunning, but compared to what: Enron? WorldCom? The Marshall Plan?

So, are we going to hear some substantive comparisons or just more: THOUSAND dollar VCRs! MILLION dollar tab at a FIVE STAR HOTEL!! BILLIONS spent!!!

Whew — got that out of my system.