The Case for Ned Lamont
Many people are clearly ready for a change [kimyo/flickr]
In the wake of Ned Lamont’s defeat of Senator Joe Lieberman in the Connecticut Democratic Primary, we got in touch with listeners in the Nutmeg State. Their responses are far from a statistical sample, but they do offer insight into the large part of the electorate that opted for an anti-war businessman rather than a moderate, 18-year-veteran of the Senate.
Bryan McKay of Branford, who blogs at Les Faits de la Fiction, could have registered to vote in Massachusetts, where he is a student.
I registered as a Democrat with the sole purpose of being able to vote in this primary. My own politics typically fall to the left of the increasingly centrist Democratic party, but after growing up with Lieberman, I knew that he had to go. … Needless to say, I voted for Lamont.
I actually found it very surprising how much national attention this election got. Lieberman’s voice only counts for one percent of the Senate, but it was clearly a bigger issue than that. I think this might signal a real sea change in the Democratic party. I’d like to see it signal a sea change in politics in general. We can’t have incumbents sitting in Congress for eighteen years when they no longer represent their constituents. That was my biggest problem with Lieberman. He talked about how he was doing what he thought was right and he made a big deal about personal integrity, but ultimately the goal of a politician should be to serve his constituency. This primary showed us that he clearly wasn’t doing his job anymore. The six-year term limit seems too long as it is. He’s been Senator for almost as long as I’ve been alive, and he’s only had to campaign three times to get there. A lot can change in six years, and a lot clearly has.
Bryan McKay, Les Faits de la Fiction, in an email to Open Source, 8/9/06
David M. Smith lives in Westport.
I think the reason we have three branches of government is that there should be checks and balances. I think we’re getting far away from that. The Bush administration and its arrogance is getting out of control. I’m dumbfounded that people are taken in by half of the stuff they do.
I was particularly ticked off by that one quote of [Lieberman's], when he said that there should be no dissenting voice against the president during a time of war…whatever he said. Especially in this current situation, we could be lied into a war…there is no dissention, there is a huge rubber stamp in congress. I would be very happy to see something else there, a little more of a voice of the people. If Lieberman had been paying attention to the voice of the state, he’d still be in office. He has been a good senator, a good statesman in a way, but he’s sort of lost his loyalty to the voters of this state by not being aware of what is going on in people’s minds.
David M. Smith, in a phone call with Open Source, 8/9/06
David Kluskiewicz lives in West Hartford. He works in marketing and thinks highly of Lamont’s background in business.
It’s good, the way he comes off when he speaks, he doesn’t know all the answers. Those are things that I see in him that may be intangible…that show some promise. It is less talking head, more asking tough questions.
I see it resonating across the country, that this is a shot across the bow that it isn’t ok to be a career politician. You have to bring new ideas to the table. [The potential of fracture] makes me really discouraged with the Democratic party. … What I would hope is that [Lieberman] would say, “What I was doing may not have been right. I need to help my party.” It seems terribly wasteful. I am optimistic, I’ve looked at blogs and stuff, and I see what is happening in other places. it is great to have this community conversation.
David Kluskiewicz, in a phone call with Open Source, 8/9/06
You have to say that it is a big thing to want to take a senior senator out, because the accumulated seniority really matters. Just look at Senator Byrd and what he has done for West Virginia. I heard a comment this morning saying that around here, a big thing is keeping the sub base in New London open, having the wherewithal to demand that the Navy stay in place. That is something an 18-year veteran in the Senate would have more juice to do. You have to make that decision, you don’t make that decision lightly, to get rid of a guy. I have a 19-year-old son. We have no draft, but the idea of putting our children in this civil war [in Iraq] and letting it continue is outragous to me.
David M. Smith, in a phone call with Open Source, 8/9/06
As for the November election, well, it would be a lie to say I’m not worried. The same polls that showed Lamont winning the primary showed Lieberman taking a substantial victory in the event of a three-way race. Hopefully someone talks some sense into him before that happens though. I know the big Democrats who supported Lieberman are going to start backing Lamont. I wouldn’t be surprised if Clinton hasn’t already been on the phone with him, trying to talk some sense. This is just going to splinter the party at a time when we need to be cohesive on these issues. We don’t all need to agree on everything, we don’t all need to toe the party line, but we need to work to win back Congress. In last night’s concession speech, Lieberman said that he’d be running as an “independent Democrat.” But that doesn’t even make sense. The Democrats made it clear last night that they want to field a fresh candidate. The Democrats chose Lieberman, and now Lieberman is choosing to break ties. Trying to hold onto that with a phrase like “independent Democrat” is disingenuous, and it denies the fact that his Democratic constituents have made a different choice.
Bryan McKay, in an email to Open Source, 8/9/06
free viagra
buy viagra online
generic viagra
how does viagra work
cheap viagra
buy viagra
buy viagra online inurl
viagra 6 free samples
viagra online
viagra for women
viagra side effects
female viagra
natural viagra
online viagra
cheapest viagra prices
herbal viagra
alternative to viagra
buy generic viagra
purchase viagra online
free viagra without prescription
viagra attorneys
free viagra samples before buying
buy generic viagra cheap
viagra uk
generic viagra online
try viagra for free
generic viagra from india
fda approves viagra
free viagra sample
what is better viagra or levitra
discount generic viagra online
viagra cialis levitra
viagra dosage
viagra cheap
viagra on line
best price for viagra
free sample pack of viagra
viagra generic
viagra without prescription
discount viagra
gay viagra
mail order viagra
viagra inurl
generic viagra online paypal
generic viagra overnight
generic viagra online pharmacy
generic viagra uk
buy cheap viagra online uk
suppliers of viagra
how long does viagra last
viagra sex
generic viagra soft tabs
generic viagra 100mg
buy viagra onli
generic viagra online without prescription
viagra energy drink
cheapest uk supplier viagra
viagra cialis
generic viagra safe
viagra professional
viagra sales
viagra free trial pack
viagra lawyers
over the counter viagra
best price for generic viagra
viagra jokes
buying viagra
viagra samples
viagra sample
cialis
generic cialis
cheapest cialis
buy cialis online
buying generic cialis
cialis for order
what are the side effects of cialis
buy generic cialis
what is the generic name for cialis
cheap cialis
cialis online
buy cialis
cialis side effects
how long does cialis last
cialis forum
cialis lawyer ohio
cialis attorneys
cialis attorney columbus
cialis injury lawyer ohio
cialis injury attorney ohio
cialis injury lawyer columbus
prices cialis
cialis lawyers
viagra cialis levitra
cialis lawyer columbus
online generic cialis
daily cialis
cialis injury attorney columbus
cialis attorney ohio
cialis cost
cialis professional
cialis super active
how does cialis work
what does cialis look like
cialis drug
viagra cialis
cialis to buy new zealand
cialis without prescription
free cialis
cialis soft tabs
discount cialis
cialis generic
generic cialis from india
cheap cialis sale online
cialis daily
cialis reviews
cialis generico
how can i take cialis
cheap cialis si
cialis vs viagra
levitra
generic levitra
levitra attorneys
what is better viagra or levitra
viagra cialis levitra
levitra side effects
buy levitra
levitra online
levitra dangers
how does levitra work
levitra lawyers
what is the difference between levitra and viagra
levitra versus viagra
which works better viagra or levitra
buy levitra and overnight shipping
levitra vs viagra
canidan pharmacies levitra
how long does levitra last
viagra cialis levitra
levitra acheter
comprare levitra
levitra ohne rezept
levitra 20mg
levitra senza ricetta
cheapest generic levitra
levitra compra
cheap levitra
levitra overnight
levitra generika
levitra kaufen
August 9th, 2006 at 9:10 pm
Of course Chris will support Lamont.
I hope he loses. I would vote for Lieberman if I could.
August 9th, 2006 at 9:20 pm
fiddlesticks, I called each registered listener that provided a telephone number and emailed the rest in contacting Connecticut residents. As it happened, the three people with whom I connected were Lamont supporters.
August 9th, 2006 at 9:47 pm
I’m sure you’d love to vote for Lieberman, fiddlesticks, but unfortunately the voters of Connecticut are the ones that get to decide who represents them in the Senate. Sorry!
Thanks for the quotes, Henry! I’m honored!
August 10th, 2006 at 8:07 am
Henry: “I called each registered listener that provided a telephone number and emailed the rest in contacting Connecticut residents. As it happened, the three people with whom I connected were Lamont supporters.”
You need to try harder! Fairness requires it. You are putting laziness in the service of your political bias.
August 10th, 2006 at 8:08 am
bryan, wait till the general election.
August 10th, 2006 at 8:27 am
I would have liked to hear the opinion of a lieberman voter. Judgeing from this sight Lamont had 100% of the vote. He must be a hell of a politician.
August 10th, 2006 at 9:44 am
Fiddlesticks, rc21 –
Were we a newspaper in Connecticut on the eve of the primary election, we would have an obligation to ensure that both candidates were represented fairly on our site. As it is, we’re a national show, seeking to understand after the fact a primary result that doesn’t come around all that often: a three-time sitting Senator fails to get his party’s nomination. It’s a pretty fair question to get in touch with those who voted to deny Lieberman the nomination and ask them why.
We are not a polling organization. The best we can do is talk to as many humans as we can find, using the techniques we’ve developed for this site. Seeing as how we made it clear from the first paragraph that Henry’s interviews aren’t a statistical sample of the Democratic electorate in Connecticut, we’re pretty happy with what he was able to pull together in a half-day.
And fiddlesticks, please don’t call Henry or anyone else who works here “lazy.” We get it, you think we have a liberal bias. If you’re going to spend time in these threads, try working a little harder yourself; find someone in Connecticut who voted for Lieberman and have him send me an email, brendan radioopensource org.
August 10th, 2006 at 10:27 am
Another threat from civil rights advocate Brendan.
August 10th, 2006 at 10:29 am
The Lieberman race just got more interesting:
“Bloomberg’s Endorsement of Lieberman Hints at Plans of His Own”
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/08/10/nyregion/10bloomberg.html
“Leaving open the door to joining a third party himself someday, Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg offered a robust endorsement to Senator Joseph I. Lieberman yesterday, lending the senator’s struggling re-election bid the influence of a popular mayor with demonstrated appeal to both Democrats and Republicans.
“What I like about Joe Lieberman is he’s trying to run because he thinks he can make a difference for the people of this country and the people of Connecticut,â€? the mayor said at a news conference on the Far West Side of Manhattan. “This country needs nonpartisan elected officials who think that doing the right thing for the public is more important than supporting some party.â€?”
This is the real story!
Check out also an op ed piece in the NY Times on Lieberman by David Brooks.
August 10th, 2006 at 12:39 pm
I wanted to hear from a liberman voter to see why he thought Lieberman lost.
There may be a difference in what lieberman dems think and what lamont dems think.
I would think as journalists you would want to get opinions from both sides of the dem party. If im not mistaken Joe did garner a fair % of the vote. Conn is a state with over a million people. Surely you could have found one Lieberman dem.
August 14th, 2006 at 8:50 am
Fist let me say how gratifying it is to have Connecticut politics in the news without anyone going to jail, the web hacking not withstanding.
I enthusiastically voted for Lamont. Â My vote was about more than the war in Iraq. Â In fact, I accept the fact that we are at war and we need to own what we have done. Â My Issue with Lieberman has more to do with his chastising those who seek to voice dissent or investigate various attributes to the war. And this is the most glaring example of why I feel as though Liebermann is positioning himself as a national politician and not a senator from CT. Â On many issues, right to life and gay marriage he is out of step with his constituency and I had the distinct feeling that he took for granted his elected position and was looking to places outside of Connecticut for approval.
Additionally, I am a 31 year old man who has only known Liebermann as the democratic Senate Candidate and this troubles me some.
His petitioning to run as an independent I feel is sour grapes. Â The secretary of state here (a Dem.) is looking to propose legislation to close the loophole allowing a candidate to lose an election and still run for office.
Lieberman, who blasted Lamont for his petty partisanship, is now being quoted as saying that voting for Lamont is tantamount to supporting terrorism. Â I trust that Connecticut is smarter than that.
As an aside, the majority of registered voters in CT are registered independent and much like Massachusetts, we are considered a bastion of liberalism, but haven’t had a democratic governor since who knows when.