<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Democrats&#039; New Reading List</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radioopensource.org/the-democrats-new-reading-list/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-democrats-new-reading-list/</link>
	<description>Christopher Lydon in conversation on arts, ideas and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:09:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schumolberry</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-democrats-new-reading-list/#comment-80585</link>
		<dc:creator>Schumolberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=797#comment-80585</guid>
		<description>jz, I&#039;ve read some good stuff by Herman Daley. But not lately. Since not lately...I get he and Doug Henwood mixed up.  I wonder if  &quot;Steady State Economy&quot; has points in common with an article I recently dug up and re-read. It&#039;s by Prabir Purkayastha, and the print-out I have reflects a very irritating lack of proofreading. But it covers a lot of phenomena (up to the moment phenomena) that broad-stroke theorists somehow never get to even in books. The title of the article is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zmag.org/lac/purkayastha.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Work, Production Systems and the Trajectory of Change: Some Reflections&lt;/a&gt;.



Other titles that might be worth it:



&quot;What Would Jefferson Do?&quot; Thom Hartmann



&quot;The Revolt of the Elites&quot; Christopher Lasch



Probably completely worth the time, though I have made just a little for dabbling in it:



&quot;The Rise of the Meritocracy&quot; by Michael Young



Hartmann goes all the way back to the Saxons for democracy roots...that he claims are &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt;germane to our experience in the U.S....the Athenians arguably [I half-way presume myself] related more to theory. Democracy devolves responsibility to all members. The main feature of such seems to me is that folks who previously were available in the scapegoat herd...have taken on the responsibility of leading themselves (taken it on by degrees over the centuries). Hartmann provides a number of cases of democracy in other kinds of tribal life, which, taken as a whole, I really doubt were prevalent...or gaining much ground until around 1500 BCE. That&#039;s sort of a statistical, anthropological contention, not meant to detract from the instances Hartmann cites. I find the idea that democracy has come on as accelerated distancing from scapegoatism plausible...and would not go to Hartmann&#039;s anthropological roots for real solid grounding. But I&#039;d like to hear from folks who think otherwise on this point. It used to seem like splittin hairs, but one position to me would seem to necessitate more tolerance...and less theocracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jz, I&#8217;ve read some good stuff by Herman Daley. But not lately. Since not lately&#8230;I get he and Doug Henwood mixed up.  I wonder if  &#8220;Steady State Economy&#8221; has points in common with an article I recently dug up and re-read. It&#8217;s by Prabir Purkayastha, and the print-out I have reflects a very irritating lack of proofreading. But it covers a lot of phenomena (up to the moment phenomena) that broad-stroke theorists somehow never get to even in books. The title of the article is <a  href="http://www.zmag.org/lac/purkayastha.htm" rel="nofollow">Work, Production Systems and the Trajectory of Change: Some Reflections</a>.</p>
<p>Other titles that might be worth it:</p>
<p>&#8220;What Would Jefferson Do?&#8221; Thom Hartmann</p>
<p>&#8220;The Revolt of the Elites&#8221; Christopher Lasch</p>
<p>Probably completely worth the time, though I have made just a little for dabbling in it:</p>
<p>&#8220;The Rise of the Meritocracy&#8221; by Michael Young</p>
<p>Hartmann goes all the way back to the Saxons for democracy roots&#8230;that he claims are <i>really</i>germane to our experience in the U.S&#8230;.the Athenians arguably [I half-way presume myself] related more to theory. Democracy devolves responsibility to all members. The main feature of such seems to me is that folks who previously were available in the scapegoat herd&#8230;have taken on the responsibility of leading themselves (taken it on by degrees over the centuries). Hartmann provides a number of cases of democracy in other kinds of tribal life, which, taken as a whole, I really doubt were prevalent&#8230;or gaining much ground until around 1500 BCE. That&#8217;s sort of a statistical, anthropological contention, not meant to detract from the instances Hartmann cites. I find the idea that democracy has come on as accelerated distancing from scapegoatism plausible&#8230;and would not go to Hartmann&#8217;s anthropological roots for real solid grounding. But I&#8217;d like to hear from folks who think otherwise on this point. It used to seem like splittin hairs, but one position to me would seem to necessitate more tolerance&#8230;and less theocracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Asher</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-democrats-new-reading-list/#comment-80584</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Asher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 02:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=797#comment-80584</guid>
		<description>A Bright Shining Lie: John Paul Vann and America in Vietnam, (Neil Sheehan, 1988),  in which they will learn:



First: How intelligent, savvy, well-meaning people can fall for their own hopes and dreams.  Second, exactly how intelligence becomes disinformation without the either conspiracy or intent.  Third, just how America&#039;s brand of colonialism does and does not work like the old school brand, and, concomittantly, why the Iraqi&#039;s never showed up with those flowers.  And, what a little corruption can turn into and how it can cripple, well, everything.  The pitfalls of being an &#039;advisor&#039; to someone else&#039;s army.  They may learn how to lose the backing of the American people by lying to them.  And finally, why America&#039;s image of herself as the eternal &#039;good guy&#039; can make us behave like bad guys.



They won&#039;t learn much about fighting a home-grown insurgency with a single, highly intelligent and very canny leader, head of a (more or less) functioning government.  They are stuck with myriad insurgencies headed by a variety of men with a variety of axes to grind and no government in sight.  Way different!



And a great deal more



They will learn that a truly great writer can make an 800-page biography go down like cool water on a hot day.



To balance that, they should try 4 Hours in My Lai.  This will teach them how good kids come to do heinous acts, and why we must include in any solution, a means to get our soldiers out of Iraq regularly and for extended periods.  How frustration and racism come together to dehumanize every Iraqi, insurgent or not.



Reading Iraqi fiction, biography, history (by Middle Eastern historians) and poetry may be the best antidote to the above.  I intend to begin ASAP.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Bright Shining Lie: John Paul Vann and America in Vietnam, (Neil Sheehan, 1988),  in which they will learn:</p>
<p>First: How intelligent, savvy, well-meaning people can fall for their own hopes and dreams.  Second, exactly how intelligence becomes disinformation without the either conspiracy or intent.  Third, just how America&#8217;s brand of colonialism does and does not work like the old school brand, and, concomittantly, why the Iraqi&#8217;s never showed up with those flowers.  And, what a little corruption can turn into and how it can cripple, well, everything.  The pitfalls of being an &#8216;advisor&#8217; to someone else&#8217;s army.  They may learn how to lose the backing of the American people by lying to them.  And finally, why America&#8217;s image of herself as the eternal &#8216;good guy&#8217; can make us behave like bad guys.</p>
<p>They won&#8217;t learn much about fighting a home-grown insurgency with a single, highly intelligent and very canny leader, head of a (more or less) functioning government.  They are stuck with myriad insurgencies headed by a variety of men with a variety of axes to grind and no government in sight.  Way different!</p>
<p>And a great deal more</p>
<p>They will learn that a truly great writer can make an 800-page biography go down like cool water on a hot day.</p>
<p>To balance that, they should try 4 Hours in My Lai.  This will teach them how good kids come to do heinous acts, and why we must include in any solution, a means to get our soldiers out of Iraq regularly and for extended periods.  How frustration and racism come together to dehumanize every Iraqi, insurgent or not.</p>
<p>Reading Iraqi fiction, biography, history (by Middle Eastern historians) and poetry may be the best antidote to the above.  I intend to begin ASAP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenVortex</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-democrats-new-reading-list/#comment-80583</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenVortex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 00:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=797#comment-80583</guid>
		<description>Sorry about the last post, I just saw it under features:

http://www.radioopensource.org/reading-for-the-new-majority/



Thanks for the great show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about the last post, I just saw it under features:</p>
<p><a  href="http://www.radioopensource.org/reading-for-the-new-majority/" rel="nofollow">http://www.radioopensource.org/reading-for-the-new-majority/</a></p>
<p>Thanks for the great show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenVortex</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-democrats-new-reading-list/#comment-80582</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenVortex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 00:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=797#comment-80582</guid>
		<description>Has anyone gathered the list of recommendations into a single formatted page? I was hoping to put together my wish list and lazy as I am, would love to avoid sifting through the whole thread. (Or was the notion of creating a reading list purely rhetorical?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone gathered the list of recommendations into a single formatted page? I was hoping to put together my wish list and lazy as I am, would love to avoid sifting through the whole thread. (Or was the notion of creating a reading list purely rhetorical?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hamlet</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-democrats-new-reading-list/#comment-80581</link>
		<dc:creator>Hamlet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 23:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=797#comment-80581</guid>
		<description>I suggest watching at least three episodes of &quot;The Dog Whisperer,&quot; with Cesar Milan, on the National Geographic Channel and scan his book, &quot;Cesar&#039;s Way.&quot;  Not a joke!  He demonstrates the effectiveness of wise assessment followed by Assertiveness rather than Aggression to both defend one&#039;s territory and provide leadership. War IS outdated.  I believe the principles are transferrable.  The New Yorker magazine saw his amazing insight and did a lengthy article a few months back.



I suggest also the November 9th epidode of &quot;KCTS Connects&quot;, on Seattle Public Television.  I recommend the program, esp. the interview with Scott Ritter on his book &quot;Target Iran&quot; as well as the book.



Ritter argued very convincingly the likelihood of an Iran war was virtually 100%.   He claims Bush&#039;s conviction that he must take down Iran came in the same way he arrived at his Iraq decision--Faith Based rather than Fact Based analysis.  He claims the Democrats are on the same bandwagon and are not likely to oppose.  His arguments were literate, well articulated and a clear reminder of the same warnings by &#039;the informed&#039; who opposed the invasion of Iraq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest watching at least three episodes of &#8220;The Dog Whisperer,&#8221; with Cesar Milan, on the National Geographic Channel and scan his book, &#8220;Cesar&#8217;s Way.&#8221;  Not a joke!  He demonstrates the effectiveness of wise assessment followed by Assertiveness rather than Aggression to both defend one&#8217;s territory and provide leadership. War IS outdated.  I believe the principles are transferrable.  The New Yorker magazine saw his amazing insight and did a lengthy article a few months back.</p>
<p>I suggest also the November 9th epidode of &#8220;KCTS Connects&#8221;, on Seattle Public Television.  I recommend the program, esp. the interview with Scott Ritter on his book &#8220;Target Iran&#8221; as well as the book.</p>
<p>Ritter argued very convincingly the likelihood of an Iran war was virtually 100%.   He claims Bush&#8217;s conviction that he must take down Iran came in the same way he arrived at his Iraq decision&#8211;Faith Based rather than Fact Based analysis.  He claims the Democrats are on the same bandwagon and are not likely to oppose.  His arguments were literate, well articulated and a clear reminder of the same warnings by &#8216;the informed&#8217; who opposed the invasion of Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Cowhig</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-democrats-new-reading-list/#comment-80580</link>
		<dc:creator>David Cowhig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 13:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=797#comment-80580</guid>
		<description>I suggest &quot;America Right or Wrong: An Anatomy of American Nationalism&quot; by Anatol Lieven of the New America Foundation. Oxford 2003.

http://www.amazon.com/America-Right-Wrong-American-Nationalism/dp/0195168402</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suggest &#8220;America Right or Wrong: An Anatomy of American Nationalism&#8221; by Anatol Lieven of the New America Foundation. Oxford 2003.</p>
<p><a  href="http://www.amazon.com/America-Right-Wrong-American-Nationalism/dp/0195168402" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/America-Right-Wrong-American-Nationalism/dp/0195168402</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vigneron</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-democrats-new-reading-list/#comment-80579</link>
		<dc:creator>vigneron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 19:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=797#comment-80579</guid>
		<description>The U.S. Constitution.



&quot;No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.&quot; U.S. Constitution- Article I, Section 9.



A Bill of Attainder is a law that specifically applies to a group of persons. I&#039;m referring to detainees held by the military, charged with crimes under our domestic law for actions done in a foreign nation.



Ex post facto. Congress has given immunity for crimes committed by our agents against enemies in the field and detainees.



I want my Constitution back!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Constitution.</p>
<p>&#8220;No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.&#8221; U.S. Constitution- Article I, Section 9.</p>
<p>A Bill of Attainder is a law that specifically applies to a group of persons. I&#8217;m referring to detainees held by the military, charged with crimes under our domestic law for actions done in a foreign nation.</p>
<p>Ex post facto. Congress has given immunity for crimes committed by our agents against enemies in the field and detainees.</p>
<p>I want my Constitution back!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hurley</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-democrats-new-reading-list/#comment-80578</link>
		<dc:creator>hurley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 12:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=797#comment-80578</guid>
		<description>Apologies, darwhin. You&#039;re right. I must have been out of the room. Thanks for pointing it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies, darwhin. You&#8217;re right. I must have been out of the room. Thanks for pointing it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darwhin</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-democrats-new-reading-list/#comment-80577</link>
		<dc:creator>darwhin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 10:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=797#comment-80577</guid>
		<description>&quot;I believe youâ€™re the first to mention Chomsky. I hesitated to, assuming he would be familiar to everyone here. But regardless of what you think of him, you should take a moment and re-examine your premise, carefully.&quot;



it was in the radio show....:P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I believe youâ€™re the first to mention Chomsky. I hesitated to, assuming he would be familiar to everyone here. But regardless of what you think of him, you should take a moment and re-examine your premise, carefully.&#8221;</p>
<p>it was in the radio show&#8230;.:P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howardpark</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-democrats-new-reading-list/#comment-80576</link>
		<dc:creator>howardpark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 23:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=797#comment-80576</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m an internet book dealer and armchair political strategist.  One thing is surprising but true, there really has only been one, yes only one, serious book about the Iowa Caucuses, Hugh Winebrenner&#039;s &quot;The Iowa Caucuses: The Making of a Media Event&quot;.  There are a few good book&#039;s on New Hampshire.  There are a few campaign odyssey type books.  Winebrenner&#039;s book, dated now, is the ONLY book about the Iowa Caucuses which is, after all, how we pick our presidential nominees most years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m an internet book dealer and armchair political strategist.  One thing is surprising but true, there really has only been one, yes only one, serious book about the Iowa Caucuses, Hugh Winebrenner&#8217;s &#8220;The Iowa Caucuses: The Making of a Media Event&#8221;.  There are a few good book&#8217;s on New Hampshire.  There are a few campaign odyssey type books.  Winebrenner&#8217;s book, dated now, is the ONLY book about the Iowa Caucuses which is, after all, how we pick our presidential nominees most years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

