<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Ecstasy of Influence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radioopensource.org/the-ecstasy-of-influence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-ecstasy-of-influence/</link>
	<description>Christopher Lydon in conversation on arts, ideas and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:09:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ecstasy of Influence: A Plagiarism Mosaic &#171; Fernanda&#039;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-ecstasy-of-influence/#comment-83928</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ecstasy of Influence: A Plagiarism Mosaic &#171; Fernanda&#039;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 04:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=913#comment-83928</guid>
		<description>[...] “But this is more than a stunt” to there is no “creating.” From Christopher Lydon’s Open Source: http://www.radioopensource.org/the-ecstasy-of-influence/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “But this is more than a stunt” to there is no “creating.” From Christopher Lydon’s Open Source: <a  href="http://www.radioopensource.org/the-ecstasy-of-influence/" rel="nofollow">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-ecstasy-of-influence/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruling Imagination: Law and Creativity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Without borrowing, stealing, cribbing, remixing, mashing-up, collaging and compiling - without influences great and small, in other words - there is no &#8220;creating.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-ecstasy-of-influence/#comment-83927</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruling Imagination: Law and Creativity &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Without borrowing, stealing, cribbing, remixing, mashing-up, collaging and compiling - without influences great and small, in other words - there is no &#8220;creating.&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 07:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=913#comment-83927</guid>
		<description>[...] From Open Source: Nearly every word of [Lethem&#039;s] essay about cultural borrowing and reworking was stolen - er, appropriated - from some other source and then cobbled together with a big dose of Lethem magic to form a cohesive whole. Even the &#8220;I&#8221;s aren&#8217;t Jonathan Lethem; they&#8217;re Jonathan Rosen writing in The Talmud and the Internet about John Donne, or William Gibson in a Wired article about William Burroughs, or David Foster Wallace on a grad school seminar, or Brian Wilson in a Beach Boys song. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From Open Source: Nearly every word of [Lethem's] essay about cultural borrowing and reworking was stolen &#8211; er, appropriated &#8211; from some other source and then cobbled together with a big dose of Lethem magic to form a cohesive whole. Even the &#8220;I&#8221;s aren&#8217;t Jonathan Lethem; they&#8217;re Jonathan Rosen writing in The Talmud and the Internet about John Donne, or William Gibson in a Wired article about William Burroughs, or David Foster Wallace on a grad school seminar, or Brian Wilson in a Beach Boys song. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Pure Pitch Method - Perfect Pitch Ear Training. &#124; 7Wins.eu</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-ecstasy-of-influence/#comment-83926</link>
		<dc:creator>The Pure Pitch Method - Perfect Pitch Ear Training. &#124; 7Wins.eu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=913#comment-83926</guid>
		<description>[...] chive   » A Review of Glenn Doman and his Institutes for the Achievement of Human PotentialOpen Source  » Blog Archive   » The Ecstasy of Influence    	Ta [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] chive   » A Review of Glenn Doman and his Institutes for the Achievement of Human PotentialOpen Source  » Blog Archive   » The Ecstasy of Influence    	Ta [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fsfsylviaadrian &#187; Blog Archive &#187; THE OPEN - The Silent Hours</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-ecstasy-of-influence/#comment-83925</link>
		<dc:creator>fsfsylviaadrian &#187; Blog Archive &#187; THE OPEN - The Silent Hours</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 19:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=913#comment-83925</guid>
		<description>[...]  government. The Real XML Number excluding Charles F. Goldfarb. C Bridle Lazy stream, NJ:  The Open   TheSilent Hours Close MyEyes Bring MeDown Lost Forgotten Daybreak Just Want T [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  government. The Real XML Number excluding Charles F. Goldfarb. C Bridle Lazy stream, NJ:  The Open   TheSilent Hours Close MyEyes Bring MeDown Lost Forgotten Daybreak Just Want T [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Copying and Art at Kenneth Sherwood</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-ecstasy-of-influence/#comment-83924</link>
		<dc:creator>Copying and Art at Kenneth Sherwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 05:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=913#comment-83924</guid>
		<description>[...] ls and constraints of a new performance space &#8230; the flat panel of the liquid crystal display. http://www.radioopensource.org/the-ecstasy-of-influence/ http://harpers.org/TheEcstasyOfInfluence.html  														 				 			      	   	 	Post a Com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ls and constraints of a new performance space &#8230; the flat panel of the liquid crystal display. <a  href="http://www.radioopensource.org/the-ecstasy-of-influence/" rel="nofollow">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-ecstasy-of-influence/</a> <a  href="http://harpers.org/TheEcstasyOfInfluence.html" rel="nofollow">http://harpers.org/TheEcstasyOfInfluence.html</a>  														 				 			      	   	 	Post a Com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Textbook for the School of Rock-Chapter II &#171; Pretty Good on Paper-I Know</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-ecstasy-of-influence/#comment-83923</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Textbook for the School of Rock-Chapter II &#171; Pretty Good on Paper-I Know</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 07:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=913#comment-83923</guid>
		<description>[...] 17;s Open Source is taping a show on this idea tonight, which has a comment thread running here.? So you could check that out, too.?







 						This entry  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 17;s Open Source is taping a show on this idea tonight, which has a comment thread running here.? So you could check that out, too.?</p>
<p> 						This entry  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-03-18 &#171; Zero influence</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-ecstasy-of-influence/#comment-83922</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-03-18 &#171; Zero influence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 00:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=913#comment-83922</guid>
		<description>[...] Video itself is released under an open licence. (tags: opensource CreativeCommons video)   Open Source Â» Blog Archive Â» The Ecstasy of Influence But this is more than a stunt. I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Video itself is released under an open licence. (tags: opensource CreativeCommons video)   Open Source Â» Blog Archive Â» The Ecstasy of Influence But this is more than a stunt. I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: content source &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Ecstasy of Influence</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-ecstasy-of-influence/#comment-83921</link>
		<dc:creator>content source &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Ecstasy of Influence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=913#comment-83921</guid>
		<description>[...] hat follows in this post will be nearly as interesting. Go ahead. &#8230; Original post by David   				 				 					 						This entry was posted 												on Wednesday, D [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hat follows in this post will be nearly as interesting. Go ahead. &#8230; Original post by David   				 				 					 						This entry was posted 												on Wednesday, D [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skanky Jane</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-ecstasy-of-influence/#comment-83920</link>
		<dc:creator>Skanky Jane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=913#comment-83920</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with mt&#039;s reading of Lethem&#039;s article i.e. he&#039;s not suggesting Microsoft work for free but calling our attention to the tragedy of an overly commodified art.



I also read the &quot;Digital Resistance&quot; article left by another poster here (thank you).



This article points out that the ideal of anti-copyright may not be terribly practicle or consoling for those &quot;on the ground&quot; and may result in the garret artist. I agree with that but feel the article doens&#039;t go far enough in exploring alternatives.



For me, there needs to be some negotiation toward a solution which is neither having to work for free or copyrighting madness.



And what if it isn&#039;t about money? Or copyright? Is there a way to acknowledge the reality of intertexuality and influence while at the same time describing some ethical standards?  I guess these things are always going to be a little ambiguous.



I felt really ripped off recently and it certainly did not feel flattering. it wasn&#039;t about money and my work wasn&#039;t copyrighted. I just felt burnt, stolen from and miserable. A very nasty vibe it is to be struck by a &quot;taker&quot;.



&quot;The way we treat a thing can change its nature, though.&quot;



I believe gifts can be treated in a way they should not be treated. I believe that even something free can be stolen. Like the land for instance (and Lethem mentions this kind of theft). I would like to be really big/spiritua/postmodern/philosophical when someone tramples my gift and burns me in the process, but I&#039;m just not. Instead I want to protect myself and my gift and show the thief that there are some boundaries - slippery as they may be to situate.



SJ xx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with mt&#8217;s reading of Lethem&#8217;s article i.e. he&#8217;s not suggesting Microsoft work for free but calling our attention to the tragedy of an overly commodified art.</p>
<p>I also read the &#8220;Digital Resistance&#8221; article left by another poster here (thank you).</p>
<p>This article points out that the ideal of anti-copyright may not be terribly practicle or consoling for those &#8220;on the ground&#8221; and may result in the garret artist. I agree with that but feel the article doens&#8217;t go far enough in exploring alternatives.</p>
<p>For me, there needs to be some negotiation toward a solution which is neither having to work for free or copyrighting madness.</p>
<p>And what if it isn&#8217;t about money? Or copyright? Is there a way to acknowledge the reality of intertexuality and influence while at the same time describing some ethical standards?  I guess these things are always going to be a little ambiguous.</p>
<p>I felt really ripped off recently and it certainly did not feel flattering. it wasn&#8217;t about money and my work wasn&#8217;t copyrighted. I just felt burnt, stolen from and miserable. A very nasty vibe it is to be struck by a &#8220;taker&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;The way we treat a thing can change its nature, though.&#8221;</p>
<p>I believe gifts can be treated in a way they should not be treated. I believe that even something free can be stolen. Like the land for instance (and Lethem mentions this kind of theft). I would like to be really big/spiritua/postmodern/philosophical when someone tramples my gift and burns me in the process, but I&#8217;m just not. Instead I want to protect myself and my gift and show the thief that there are some boundaries &#8211; slippery as they may be to situate.</p>
<p>SJ xx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dig</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-ecstasy-of-influence/#comment-83919</link>
		<dc:creator>dig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 05:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=913#comment-83919</guid>
		<description>[...] 4 am
 Filed under: open source

 		Jonathan Lethem argues for the open source of ideas. Radio Open Source discusses it.  Casual discusions about art s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 4 am<br />
 Filed under: open source</p>
<p> 		Jonathan Lethem argues for the open source of ideas. Radio Open Source discusses it.  Casual discusions about art s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

