<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Evolution of Football</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/</link>
	<description>Christopher Lydon in conversation on arts, ideas and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:25:03 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Private Plays Sports Picks- Nfl, Ncaa, Nba, Mlb. &#124; 7Wins.eu</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-141591</link>
		<dc:creator>Private Plays Sports Picks- Nfl, Ncaa, Nba, Mlb. &#124; 7Wins.eu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 07:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-141591</guid>
		<description>[...] rts Fan :: New York Giants Blog and FansitePlayer Spotlight: Alexis Ajinca &#124; OwnMyTeam BlogOpen Source  » Blog Archive   » The Evolution of Football    	 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rts Fan :: New York Giants Blog and FansitePlayer Spotlight: Alexis Ajinca | OwnMyTeam BlogOpen Source  » Blog Archive   » The Evolution of Football    	 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: booth palming two basketballs</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-116189</link>
		<dc:creator>booth palming two basketballs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-116189</guid>
		<description>[...] ld add another thing that has turned basketball into a side show. The fact that palming ...http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/A,a AACHEN,cha [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ld add another thing that has turned basketball into a side show. The fact that palming &#8230;http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/A,a AACHEN,cha [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vods.mobi &#187; The NFL Networkâ€™s Amateur Hour</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-37882</link>
		<dc:creator>Vods.mobi &#187; The NFL Networkâ€™s Amateur Hour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2006 19:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-37882</guid>
		<description>[...] e: Evolution of a Game, the latter reccomended by trusted authiroites Malcolm Gladwell and Radio Open Source.  Becuase I&#8217;m among the lucky few who can, I am watching the se [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] e: Evolution of a Game, the latter reccomended by trusted authiroites Malcolm Gladwell and Radio Open Source.  Becuase I&#8217;m among the lucky few who can, I am watching the se [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The NFL Network&#8217;s Amateur Hour &#171; Media SITREP</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-36912</link>
		<dc:creator>The NFL Network&#8217;s Amateur Hour &#171; Media SITREP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 04:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-36912</guid>
		<description>[...] e: Evolution of a Game, the latter reccomended by trusted authiroites Malcolm Gladwell and Radio Open Source.  Becuase I&#8217;m among the lucky few who can, I am watching the se [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] e: Evolution of a Game, the latter reccomended by trusted authiroites Malcolm Gladwell and Radio Open Source.  Becuase I&#8217;m among the lucky few who can, I am watching the se [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: harrysebooks.com  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Late breaking news</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-34988</link>
		<dc:creator>harrysebooks.com  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Late breaking news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 06:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-34988</guid>
		<description>[...] he work if you screw up, and someone can always try to improve on your work in the future. The Evolution of Football Click to Listen to the Show (24 MB MP3)   Football 2.0 [Petro [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] he work if you screw up, and someone can always try to improve on your work in the future. The Evolution of Football Click to Listen to the Show (24 MB MP3)   Football 2.0 [Petro [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rc21</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-33949</link>
		<dc:creator>rc21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-33949</guid>
		<description>To nother:   I Played Bball growing up it was my favorite sport. The travelling and palming infractions have changed the game beyond anything that the others sports call or dont call. In the first place the strike zone has always been at the discretion of the ump,be it good or bad. Palming and travelling are infractions that have literally transformed the sport. Look at the jumpstop move. That is clearly an up and down call. 

   I really hate people always trying to bring up the race issue. My alltime favorite player is Bill Russell. And that is for every sport not just Bball. My second favorite is Larry Bird, but only because he is white There are you happy.( I&#039;m kidding )People who play and follow sports pick their heroes or people they like because of how they play the game and their personality. not because of their skin color. People who are casual sports fans may go by race. I dont know and could not care less. 

   Let me guess you are either a minority who loves basketball because it is dominated by blacks or you are a patronizing liberal who thinks if he tells all the brothers how much he loves basketball they will think &quot;Wow what a cool hip white guy&quot;  Why are you so concerned about how many white stars are in the NBA. I dont see what bearing that has on the fact that my home team the Celtics stink and have stunk for almost 20 years.

   One reason I played and coached sports for so long is because race plays little if any part in the closed environment of a team sport. No forced intergration, No liberal elitists trying to socialy engineer some bizzare multi ethnic,culturaly diverse scenario, where every group gets egual attention and is given equal value. It is just a bunch of guys/women working hard togeather to achieve a single goal. This is how special friendships are formed that last a lifetime. It is also the best way to get races to come togeather. I experienced the same thing while in the service. 
    
  So if you want to bring race up fine. but in my case you are way off target. I wont speak for plnelson. He is smarter than me. He can defend himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To nother:   I Played Bball growing up it was my favorite sport. The travelling and palming infractions have changed the game beyond anything that the others sports call or dont call. In the first place the strike zone has always been at the discretion of the ump,be it good or bad. Palming and travelling are infractions that have literally transformed the sport. Look at the jumpstop move. That is clearly an up and down call. </p>
<p>   I really hate people always trying to bring up the race issue. My alltime favorite player is Bill Russell. And that is for every sport not just Bball. My second favorite is Larry Bird, but only because he is white There are you happy.( I&#8217;m kidding )People who play and follow sports pick their heroes or people they like because of how they play the game and their personality. not because of their skin color. People who are casual sports fans may go by race. I dont know and could not care less. </p>
<p>   Let me guess you are either a minority who loves basketball because it is dominated by blacks or you are a patronizing liberal who thinks if he tells all the brothers how much he loves basketball they will think &#8220;Wow what a cool hip white guy&#8221;  Why are you so concerned about how many white stars are in the NBA. I dont see what bearing that has on the fact that my home team the Celtics stink and have stunk for almost 20 years.</p>
<p>   One reason I played and coached sports for so long is because race plays little if any part in the closed environment of a team sport. No forced intergration, No liberal elitists trying to socialy engineer some bizzare multi ethnic,culturaly diverse scenario, where every group gets egual attention and is given equal value. It is just a bunch of guys/women working hard togeather to achieve a single goal. This is how special friendships are formed that last a lifetime. It is also the best way to get races to come togeather. I experienced the same thing while in the service. </p>
<p>  So if you want to bring race up fine. but in my case you are way off target. I wont speak for plnelson. He is smarter than me. He can defend himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nother</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-33944</link>
		<dc:creator>nother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-33944</guid>
		<description>corrections: Terry O&#039;reilly and in my 4:24 post I said parody instead of parity, duhh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>corrections: Terry O&#8217;reilly and in my 4:24 post I said parody instead of parity, duhh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nother</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-33943</link>
		<dc:creator>nother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-33943</guid>
		<description>What about Terry O&#039;riely charging into the stands years ago, didn&#039;t Ted Williams spit on fans, I know their are baseball players who have gone into the stands.  You say &quot;these players are the exceptions&quot;  Ok, what about Ray Allen, Ben Wallace, Grant Hill, Richard Jefferson, I could give you more if you like.  Tell me the sport or the era you like or liked and I will give you names of player comparable to Bryant, Rodman, and Artest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Terry O&#8217;riely charging into the stands years ago, didn&#8217;t Ted Williams spit on fans, I know their are baseball players who have gone into the stands.  You say &#8220;these players are the exceptions&#8221;  Ok, what about Ray Allen, Ben Wallace, Grant Hill, Richard Jefferson, I could give you more if you like.  Tell me the sport or the era you like or liked and I will give you names of player comparable to Bryant, Rodman, and Artest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plnelson</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-33926</link>
		<dc:creator>plnelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-33926</guid>
		<description>&quot;They have succeeded as a team, by checking their egos at the door and by playing great defense. They are a role model for kids everywhere. They would suceed in any era.

Another fact, the NBAâ€™s best player right now is LeBron James and he is a model citizen. &quot;

But these players are the exception.  They arose as a REACTION to the all the Kobe Bryants and Dennis Rodmans and Ron Artest charging into the stands at a Pistons/Pacers game 2 years ago.   

&quot;Yet you still watch MLB, why?&quot;

&#039;You&#039; who?  I stopped watching MLB years ago, for exactly the reasons I mentioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They have succeeded as a team, by checking their egos at the door and by playing great defense. They are a role model for kids everywhere. They would suceed in any era.</p>
<p>Another fact, the NBAâ€™s best player right now is LeBron James and he is a model citizen. &#8221;</p>
<p>But these players are the exception.  They arose as a REACTION to the all the Kobe Bryants and Dennis Rodmans and Ron Artest charging into the stands at a Pistons/Pacers game 2 years ago.   </p>
<p>&#8220;Yet you still watch MLB, why?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8216;You&#8217; who?  I stopped watching MLB years ago, for exactly the reasons I mentioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nother</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-33917</link>
		<dc:creator>nother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 06:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-33917</guid>
		<description>Expansion has hurt every sport, look at hockey.  In baseball there are many pitchers pitching in the bigs who shouldn&#039;t be out of double A, here they are though giving of homers by the bus load.    Yet you still watch MLB, why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Expansion has hurt every sport, look at hockey.  In baseball there are many pitchers pitching in the bigs who shouldn&#8217;t be out of double A, here they are though giving of homers by the bus load.    Yet you still watch MLB, why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nother</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-33916</link>
		<dc:creator>nother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 06:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-33916</guid>
		<description>Well, the way I see it you guys are missing out, there are some great things happing in the NBA.  Iâ€™m perplexed at your criticism but not surprised.  I take it that you two are white American men right?  I tend bar and talk sports with many people and with very few exceptions they the white Americans criticize todayâ€™s NBA.  Please donâ€™t get me wrong; Iâ€™m not saying you are racist.  What Iâ€™m saying is there is a BIG difference between todayâ€™s NBA and your dadâ€™s NBA.  The difference is there are NO white American stars in the NBA.  Name one for me.  There are a few white guys but they are foreigners.  The way I see it, all these white Americans that criticize todayâ€™s NBA simply do not identify with todayâ€™s players.

You write: â€œTwo things have changed - the quality of play has gotten TERRIBLE with all the expansion teams. And also itâ€™s hard to play well carrying around all that EGO that modern basketball players seem to have.â€

Youâ€™re dead wrong.  The fact is the best team the last few years has been the Detroit Pistons, a model team.  This is a team without superstars, Chauncey Billops is their best player and anyone could have had him a few years ago.  They have succeeded as a team, by checking their egos at the door and by playing great defense.  They are a role model for kids everywhere.  They would suceed in any era.

Another fact, the NBAâ€™s best player right now is LeBron James and he is a model citizen.  Has he shown you something with his ego that turns you off?  Tim Duncan, Dirk Nowitzki, Steve Nash, all model citizens who whose level of play could be matched up to any era.  Sure you could give me some names of players whose egos hurt their teams but for every NBA player you give me, Iâ€™ll give you the name of a football or baseball player whose ego has been a detriment to their team.  You say you donâ€™t watch because of the lack of palming and traveling calls, are you serious?  Thatâ€™s like saying I not going to watch football because of the lack of Interference calls, or forget baseball because ot the lack of adherence to the strike zone.  The lack of enforcement of these rules happens in every sport and like it or not, itâ€™s to encourage more scoring.

My hope really is you will step back and look at the NBA anew.  In the words of Rick Pitino, Larry Bird, Robert Parish, Kevin McHale, are not walking through that door folks â€“ but some new great players are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the way I see it you guys are missing out, there are some great things happing in the NBA.  Iâ€™m perplexed at your criticism but not surprised.  I take it that you two are white American men right?  I tend bar and talk sports with many people and with very few exceptions they the white Americans criticize todayâ€™s NBA.  Please donâ€™t get me wrong; Iâ€™m not saying you are racist.  What Iâ€™m saying is there is a BIG difference between todayâ€™s NBA and your dadâ€™s NBA.  The difference is there are NO white American stars in the NBA.  Name one for me.  There are a few white guys but they are foreigners.  The way I see it, all these white Americans that criticize todayâ€™s NBA simply do not identify with todayâ€™s players.</p>
<p>You write: â€œTwo things have changed &#8211; the quality of play has gotten TERRIBLE with all the expansion teams. And also itâ€™s hard to play well carrying around all that EGO that modern basketball players seem to have.â€</p>
<p>Youâ€™re dead wrong.  The fact is the best team the last few years has been the Detroit Pistons, a model team.  This is a team without superstars, Chauncey Billops is their best player and anyone could have had him a few years ago.  They have succeeded as a team, by checking their egos at the door and by playing great defense.  They are a role model for kids everywhere.  They would suceed in any era.</p>
<p>Another fact, the NBAâ€™s best player right now is LeBron James and he is a model citizen.  Has he shown you something with his ego that turns you off?  Tim Duncan, Dirk Nowitzki, Steve Nash, all model citizens who whose level of play could be matched up to any era.  Sure you could give me some names of players whose egos hurt their teams but for every NBA player you give me, Iâ€™ll give you the name of a football or baseball player whose ego has been a detriment to their team.  You say you donâ€™t watch because of the lack of palming and traveling calls, are you serious?  Thatâ€™s like saying I not going to watch football because of the lack of Interference calls, or forget baseball because ot the lack of adherence to the strike zone.  The lack of enforcement of these rules happens in every sport and like it or not, itâ€™s to encourage more scoring.</p>
<p>My hope really is you will step back and look at the NBA anew.  In the words of Rick Pitino, Larry Bird, Robert Parish, Kevin McHale, are not walking through that door folks â€“ but some new great players are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rc21</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-33875</link>
		<dc:creator>rc21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 00:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-33875</guid>
		<description>To plnelson :  Those are exactly my sentiments. I would add another thing that has turned basketball into a side show. The fact that palming and traveling have become a major part of the game yet they are almost never called.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To plnelson :  Those are exactly my sentiments. I would add another thing that has turned basketball into a side show. The fact that palming and traveling have become a major part of the game yet they are almost never called.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plnelson</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-33836</link>
		<dc:creator>plnelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-33836</guid>
		<description>&quot;Just wondering if others have had this experience. Sorry I did not mean to change the subject. &quot;

I used to be a big baseball fan but I got fed up with the way money has distorted the game.   

Also, in the old days of baseball you could hardly imagine your star players playing for anyone else, at least in the prime of their careers.   Sometimes in their declining years a bona-fide star might get traded, or a star might begin as a rookie for another team, but during their prime they played for one team.       Micky Mantle was a Yankee, period.   Ditto with Whitey Ford.     Ted Williams and Yaz were Red Sox.    Stan the Man played for the Cards.     

Nowadays baseball players are just mercenaries with no team loyalty.

Also i used to be a much bigger basketball fan a few decades ago (it probabl yhelped that in those days the Celtics were class of NBA for years.)   Two things hav changed - the quality of play has gotten TERRIBLE with all the expansion teams.    And also it&#039;s hard to play well carrying around all that EGO that modern basketball players seem to have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Just wondering if others have had this experience. Sorry I did not mean to change the subject. &#8221;</p>
<p>I used to be a big baseball fan but I got fed up with the way money has distorted the game.   </p>
<p>Also, in the old days of baseball you could hardly imagine your star players playing for anyone else, at least in the prime of their careers.   Sometimes in their declining years a bona-fide star might get traded, or a star might begin as a rookie for another team, but during their prime they played for one team.       Micky Mantle was a Yankee, period.   Ditto with Whitey Ford.     Ted Williams and Yaz were Red Sox.    Stan the Man played for the Cards.     </p>
<p>Nowadays baseball players are just mercenaries with no team loyalty.</p>
<p>Also i used to be a much bigger basketball fan a few decades ago (it probabl yhelped that in those days the Celtics were class of NBA for years.)   Two things hav changed &#8211; the quality of play has gotten TERRIBLE with all the expansion teams.    And also it&#8217;s hard to play well carrying around all that EGO that modern basketball players seem to have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plnelson</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-33832</link>
		<dc:creator>plnelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-33832</guid>
		<description>&quot;Pinelson made some good points but he(?) was missing the point. The structure of teams, the specialization of the teams, the money of teams, is what embodies the corporate centric structure of the US, &quot;

But nother&#039;s QUESTION was why don&#039;t other countries adopt football.    

The &quot;corporate structure&quot; has nothing to do with that.  

I work for a large, European multinational corporation.     The Europeans are perfectly capable of using a &quot;corporate structure&quot; where it suits them.   There is nothing uniquely American, about a hierarchical, heavily specialized corporation.   Plenty of Japanese corporations have refined that concept to even greater heights than most US ones.   Also, watch how football offensive teams break huddles, and how some Japanese corporations end strategy meetings.   

Football doesn&#039;t have a &quot;corporate structure&quot; because it&#039;s American; Football has a &quot;corporate structure&quot; because that WORKS.   I&#039;ll bet a traditional Lombardi team wouldn&#039;t be competitive in today&#039;s NFL.

Having spent time in Japan and having worked on a cooperative project with a Japanese partner, I&#039;ve often wondered why football isn&#039;t popular over there.   Many of NFL football&#039;s values of self-sacrifice, team spirit, personal sacrifice for the team goals, and enduring pain, are elements of bushido, the Japanese warrior spirit.   Instead, Japan has embraced baseball, which, with its individualism and lack of team play, would seem antithetical to Japanese values.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Pinelson made some good points but he(?) was missing the point. The structure of teams, the specialization of the teams, the money of teams, is what embodies the corporate centric structure of the US, &#8221;</p>
<p>But nother&#8217;s QUESTION was why don&#8217;t other countries adopt football.    </p>
<p>The &#8220;corporate structure&#8221; has nothing to do with that.  </p>
<p>I work for a large, European multinational corporation.     The Europeans are perfectly capable of using a &#8220;corporate structure&#8221; where it suits them.   There is nothing uniquely American, about a hierarchical, heavily specialized corporation.   Plenty of Japanese corporations have refined that concept to even greater heights than most US ones.   Also, watch how football offensive teams break huddles, and how some Japanese corporations end strategy meetings.   </p>
<p>Football doesn&#8217;t have a &#8220;corporate structure&#8221; because it&#8217;s American; Football has a &#8220;corporate structure&#8221; because that WORKS.   I&#8217;ll bet a traditional Lombardi team wouldn&#8217;t be competitive in today&#8217;s NFL.</p>
<p>Having spent time in Japan and having worked on a cooperative project with a Japanese partner, I&#8217;ve often wondered why football isn&#8217;t popular over there.   Many of NFL football&#8217;s values of self-sacrifice, team spirit, personal sacrifice for the team goals, and enduring pain, are elements of bushido, the Japanese warrior spirit.   Instead, Japan has embraced baseball, which, with its individualism and lack of team play, would seem antithetical to Japanese values.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rc21</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-33818</link>
		<dc:creator>rc21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-33818</guid>
		<description>To nother: you are correct. It is fine to over analyze football. I guess I should have said &quot; Lets be careful about drawing to many cultural and social conclusions&#039;&#039;. Your point about capitalism and football holds some truth but Someone could and I believe did make a case that it is also comparable to socialism. It is a definite Equal work by all  to attain the goal. vs other more individual sports. Also, &quot;The violent macho culture of football makes it popular in the USA&quot; theory. Someone pointed out bull fighting in Spain, and soccer in Europe. I will add to that the extremely macho and violent game of Hockey, which is favored by the peace loving countries of Norway and Sweeden.

     I have a question for you and others. I grew up playing all sports and really loved them. I currently am involved in sports. But I find myself becoming less interested in proffesional sports save the sox and pats. I could care less about the NBA, and that was my favorite sport growing up. I used to go right to the sports page when I was younger. Now I read it last. Just wondering if others have had this experience. Sorry I did not mean to change the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To nother: you are correct. It is fine to over analyze football. I guess I should have said &#8221; Lets be careful about drawing to many cultural and social conclusions&#8221;. Your point about capitalism and football holds some truth but Someone could and I believe did make a case that it is also comparable to socialism. It is a definite Equal work by all  to attain the goal. vs other more individual sports. Also, &#8220;The violent macho culture of football makes it popular in the USA&#8221; theory. Someone pointed out bull fighting in Spain, and soccer in Europe. I will add to that the extremely macho and violent game of Hockey, which is favored by the peace loving countries of Norway and Sweeden.</p>
<p>     I have a question for you and others. I grew up playing all sports and really loved them. I currently am involved in sports. But I find myself becoming less interested in proffesional sports save the sox and pats. I could care less about the NBA, and that was my favorite sport growing up. I used to go right to the sports page when I was younger. Now I read it last. Just wondering if others have had this experience. Sorry I did not mean to change the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nother</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-33812</link>
		<dc:creator>nother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 08:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-33812</guid>
		<description>Ahh, you guys are coming into my web of corporate theory, niceâ€¦  Specialization entails money and corporations entail money.  The more money that the NFL has grossed the more specialized it has become.  Some teams have 15 coaches now!  Are you going to tell me that Vince Lombardi had 15 coaches? I know Jim Leyland doesnâ€™t have 15 coaches.  Pinelson made some good points but he(?) was missing the point.  The structure of teams, the specialization of the teams, the money of teams, is what embodies the corporate centric structure of the US, not the structure of the league.  The structure of the league is socialistic in itâ€™s want of parody and I find that ironic or complex or something.  

Rc21 says: â€œWhy must we try and over analyze everything.â€ Why? Because itâ€™s better than watching TV.  Whatâ€s wrong with analyzing something we spend so much time watching?  Rc21, you have to admit, we watch NFL football so much, it must be taping into some major part of our culture, whatâ€™s wrong with talking about where that originates from?

The best thing about football is they play in any element, enough said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, you guys are coming into my web of corporate theory, niceâ€¦  Specialization entails money and corporations entail money.  The more money that the NFL has grossed the more specialized it has become.  Some teams have 15 coaches now!  Are you going to tell me that Vince Lombardi had 15 coaches? I know Jim Leyland doesnâ€™t have 15 coaches.  Pinelson made some good points but he(?) was missing the point.  The structure of teams, the specialization of the teams, the money of teams, is what embodies the corporate centric structure of the US, not the structure of the league.  The structure of the league is socialistic in itâ€™s want of parody and I find that ironic or complex or something.  </p>
<p>Rc21 says: â€œWhy must we try and over analyze everything.â€ Why? Because itâ€™s better than watching TV.  Whatâ€s wrong with analyzing something we spend so much time watching?  Rc21, you have to admit, we watch NFL football so much, it must be taping into some major part of our culture, whatâ€™s wrong with talking about where that originates from?</p>
<p>The best thing about football is they play in any element, enough said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fabkebab</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-33798</link>
		<dc:creator>fabkebab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-33798</guid>
		<description>As for the question about why the sport hasnt caught on in other places - 

1 ) Rich countries already have sports like soccer and rugby, and American football probably cant repay the investment required to bring it to the mainstream (which is what the previous poster said)

2 ) Poor countries probably cant afford the equipment, and also probably would not be able to tolerate the injuries since it would leave them crippled for life if they only had limited health care!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for the question about why the sport hasnt caught on in other places &#8211; </p>
<p>1 ) Rich countries already have sports like soccer and rugby, and American football probably cant repay the investment required to bring it to the mainstream (which is what the previous poster said)</p>
<p>2 ) Poor countries probably cant afford the equipment, and also probably would not be able to tolerate the injuries since it would leave them crippled for life if they only had limited health care!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fabkebab</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-33797</link>
		<dc:creator>fabkebab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-33797</guid>
		<description>For someone from UK who has never much enjoyed *American* football, I thought this was an excellent show - I really got a lot out of it which cast the sport in a new light- well done</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For someone from UK who has never much enjoyed *American* football, I thought this was an excellent show &#8211; I really got a lot out of it which cast the sport in a new light- well done</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plnelson</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-33785</link>
		<dc:creator>plnelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 21:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-33785</guid>
		<description>&quot;Also someone please answer a question I hoped they would get to in the show, why has American football not translated well to other nations, as opposed to baseball and basketball? &quot;

I think football is a very expensive sport to play.    You need to have very large rosters compared to baseball and basketball.  It&#039;s too exhausting for one player to play offense and defense in the same game (at least for long -  Patriots players like Mike Vrabel and Troy Brown often switch off but only for a few plays) .  So with offenseive and defensive players and special teams, and allowing for positional specialization and enough bench to cover the inevitable injuries, and you really need teams with 50+ man rosters.    Add to that the additional specialization needed for coaching and training, plus necessary practice squads and you&#039;re talking about huge personnel costs compared to other sports.    

And then there&#039;s all that equipment.   And the cost of maintaining a field that gets badly torn up in ordinary play, and the medical cost of the injuries that result from such a rough game, and I think American football is in another league (so to speak)  from the other sports, financially.

I think the cost factor explains a lot more than any alleged cultural differences regarding aggressive Americans -vs- peaceful, pastoral Europeans.   The British play rugby, the Spanish have bullfighting, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Also someone please answer a question I hoped they would get to in the show, why has American football not translated well to other nations, as opposed to baseball and basketball? &#8221;</p>
<p>I think football is a very expensive sport to play.    You need to have very large rosters compared to baseball and basketball.  It&#8217;s too exhausting for one player to play offense and defense in the same game (at least for long &#8211;  Patriots players like Mike Vrabel and Troy Brown often switch off but only for a few plays) .  So with offenseive and defensive players and special teams, and allowing for positional specialization and enough bench to cover the inevitable injuries, and you really need teams with 50+ man rosters.    Add to that the additional specialization needed for coaching and training, plus necessary practice squads and you&#8217;re talking about huge personnel costs compared to other sports.    </p>
<p>And then there&#8217;s all that equipment.   And the cost of maintaining a field that gets badly torn up in ordinary play, and the medical cost of the injuries that result from such a rough game, and I think American football is in another league (so to speak)  from the other sports, financially.</p>
<p>I think the cost factor explains a lot more than any alleged cultural differences regarding aggressive Americans -vs- peaceful, pastoral Europeans.   The British play rugby, the Spanish have bullfighting, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rc21</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-33757</link>
		<dc:creator>rc21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-33757</guid>
		<description>Some very good points made on this thread. To Nother football has caught on somewhat in Europe. I&#039;m not sure it will ever be as popular as basketball. You must understand the expense of the sport as opposed to basketball. Also soccer seems to be the counter to football in many countries. 

      Football is an extremly complex sport especially at the higher levels. The political and societal comparisons I find to be humorous, Why must we try and over analyze everything. Football like all sports, should be looked at for what they are..Sport. Good for the mind and good for the body.  
 
   The thing I find interesting about football as well as other sports is how much  luck, and officiating comes into play. In many cases it makes or breaks you. In the late 70,s Sugar bear Hamilton gets called for a vey controversial penalty allowing the Raiders to go on and win the super bowl. A few years ago We remember the famous tuck play with Brady.  If not for that, the Pats watch the super bowl on T.V.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some very good points made on this thread. To Nother football has caught on somewhat in Europe. I&#8217;m not sure it will ever be as popular as basketball. You must understand the expense of the sport as opposed to basketball. Also soccer seems to be the counter to football in many countries. </p>
<p>      Football is an extremly complex sport especially at the higher levels. The political and societal comparisons I find to be humorous, Why must we try and over analyze everything. Football like all sports, should be looked at for what they are..Sport. Good for the mind and good for the body.  </p>
<p>   The thing I find interesting about football as well as other sports is how much  luck, and officiating comes into play. In many cases it makes or breaks you. In the late 70,s Sugar bear Hamilton gets called for a vey controversial penalty allowing the Raiders to go on and win the super bowl. A few years ago We remember the famous tuck play with Brady.  If not for that, the Pats watch the super bowl on T.V.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nother</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-33725</link>
		<dc:creator>nother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 20:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-33725</guid>
		<description>As far as the Patriots are concerned, they are bucking the thoery put forth in the show that the passing game rules all; they are ploughing ahead this year with strickly an old school running game in the form of Maroney, Dillon, and Faulk.

A good coach does not impose his philosophy on the team he looks at the tools he has and adjusts his game plan accordingly.  For years Bill Parcells was known as a &quot;running coach&quot; but now he passes as much as anyone - he has the tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as the Patriots are concerned, they are bucking the thoery put forth in the show that the passing game rules all; they are ploughing ahead this year with strickly an old school running game in the form of Maroney, Dillon, and Faulk.</p>
<p>A good coach does not impose his philosophy on the team he looks at the tools he has and adjusts his game plan accordingly.  For years Bill Parcells was known as a &#8220;running coach&#8221; but now he passes as much as anyone &#8211; he has the tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nother</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-33724</link>
		<dc:creator>nother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-33724</guid>
		<description>Pinelson, they answerd the &quot;thinking man&quot; issue in the show.  Football is complex to play and simple to observe, while baseball is simple to play and complex to observe.  

Check out pryoungs point about &quot;play&quot; above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pinelson, they answerd the &#8220;thinking man&#8221; issue in the show.  Football is complex to play and simple to observe, while baseball is simple to play and complex to observe.  </p>
<p>Check out pryoungs point about &#8220;play&#8221; above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nother</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-33723</link>
		<dc:creator>nother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-33723</guid>
		<description>You make some good points pinelson.  Maybe we should take the pro sports out of the equation, they have entered a unique sphere where money rules all.  If we look at just high school and college football and baseball I believe my theory would hold.

Also someone please answer a question I hoped they would get to in the show, why has American football not translated well to other nations, as opposed to baseball and basketball?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make some good points pinelson.  Maybe we should take the pro sports out of the equation, they have entered a unique sphere where money rules all.  If we look at just high school and college football and baseball I believe my theory would hold.</p>
<p>Also someone please answer a question I hoped they would get to in the show, why has American football not translated well to other nations, as opposed to baseball and basketball?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plnelson</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-33719</link>
		<dc:creator>plnelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-33719</guid>
		<description>&quot;Specialization, ruthlessness, anonymity, commercialization, and of course the bottom line.&quot;

Football doesn&#039;t come CLOSE to baseball WRT corporate bottom-line thinking!

Baseball is all about money.   One of the reasons I STOPPED following basball is because of how much of it always seemed to be more appropriate for the business pages than the sports pages, with salary disputes and rich teams buying other teams&#039; star players, and crippling strikes and naked attempts to buy pennants. 

By comparison, the NFL looks like a bunch of pinko-commie socialists with their salary cap and revenue-distributing schemes and adjustments in draft picks, all in an effort to maintain a level playing field.

Furthermore, anyone who regard baseball as a thinking man&#039;s game hasn&#039;t studied an NFL playbook.    I know they don&#039;t LOOK very smart, but I&#039;m convinced football players must have minds like computers to be able to digest (and REMEMBER!)  those complex plays, and be able to adjust rapidly to different looks the other team is throwing at them.

I&#039;ve been a football fan since the third grade (when I was friends wih Billy Sullivan&#039;s son, Patrick before they packed him off to private school)  and for years suffered the embarrassment of rooting for the Patriots, who, more often than not, were an automatic &quot;W&quot; for the OTHER team&#039;s record.   But I stuck by them and these last few years have been WONDERFUL for football fans here in New England.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Specialization, ruthlessness, anonymity, commercialization, and of course the bottom line.&#8221;</p>
<p>Football doesn&#8217;t come CLOSE to baseball WRT corporate bottom-line thinking!</p>
<p>Baseball is all about money.   One of the reasons I STOPPED following basball is because of how much of it always seemed to be more appropriate for the business pages than the sports pages, with salary disputes and rich teams buying other teams&#8217; star players, and crippling strikes and naked attempts to buy pennants. </p>
<p>By comparison, the NFL looks like a bunch of pinko-commie socialists with their salary cap and revenue-distributing schemes and adjustments in draft picks, all in an effort to maintain a level playing field.</p>
<p>Furthermore, anyone who regard baseball as a thinking man&#8217;s game hasn&#8217;t studied an NFL playbook.    I know they don&#8217;t LOOK very smart, but I&#8217;m convinced football players must have minds like computers to be able to digest (and REMEMBER!)  those complex plays, and be able to adjust rapidly to different looks the other team is throwing at them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been a football fan since the third grade (when I was friends wih Billy Sullivan&#8217;s son, Patrick before they packed him off to private school)  and for years suffered the embarrassment of rooting for the Patriots, who, more often than not, were an automatic &#8220;W&#8221; for the OTHER team&#8217;s record.   But I stuck by them and these last few years have been WONDERFUL for football fans here in New England.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nother</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-33710</link>
		<dc:creator>nother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-33710</guid>
		<description>Just heard the podcast, thankyou for it.

First I want to thank David for actually contributing to the blog, something we need much more of.

The conversation started out with a discussion about the different dynamics between the Offensive and Defensive sides of the ball.  Y.S. Kim Professor of Physics at the University of Maryland writes something interesting here: http://www.physics.umd.edu/robot/einstein/kant/kant.html

&quot;I would like to stress that Taoism is not confined to the ancient Eastern world. It is practiced frequently in the United States. Let us look at American football games. The offensive strategy does not rely on brute force, but is aimed at breaking the harmony of the defense. For instance, when the offensive team is near the end zone, the defense becomes very strong because it covers only a small area. Then, it is not uncommon for the offense to place four wide-receivers instead of two. This will divide the defense into two sides while creating a hole in the middle. Then the quarter-back can carry the ball to the end zone. The key word is to destroy the balance of the defense.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just heard the podcast, thankyou for it.</p>
<p>First I want to thank David for actually contributing to the blog, something we need much more of.</p>
<p>The conversation started out with a discussion about the different dynamics between the Offensive and Defensive sides of the ball.  Y.S. Kim Professor of Physics at the University of Maryland writes something interesting here: <a href="http://www.physics.umd.edu/robot/einstein/kant/kant.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.physics.umd.edu/robot/einstein/kant/kant.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;I would like to stress that Taoism is not confined to the ancient Eastern world. It is practiced frequently in the United States. Let us look at American football games. The offensive strategy does not rely on brute force, but is aimed at breaking the harmony of the defense. For instance, when the offensive team is near the end zone, the defense becomes very strong because it covers only a small area. Then, it is not uncommon for the offense to place four wide-receivers instead of two. This will divide the defense into two sides while creating a hole in the middle. Then the quarter-back can carry the ball to the end zone. The key word is to destroy the balance of the defense.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stoneg64</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-33708</link>
		<dc:creator>stoneg64</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-33708</guid>
		<description>Great Show,  

As a massive 5-7 former high school offensive linemen, I know some of the complexities that goes into blocking for a runningback or quarterback.  I thought the game was interesting before I played but once I learned the subtleties of zone-blocking and trap-blocking, I was sold for life.  A devestating block can often be as interesting as a long pass play down the sidelines.  Intricacies such as a blocking scheme are what make watching football and endlessly interesting game to watch and learn about. Football seems to have the ultimate balance of wit and skill.

Go Pats! He he!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Show,  </p>
<p>As a massive 5-7 former high school offensive linemen, I know some of the complexities that goes into blocking for a runningback or quarterback.  I thought the game was interesting before I played but once I learned the subtleties of zone-blocking and trap-blocking, I was sold for life.  A devestating block can often be as interesting as a long pass play down the sidelines.  Intricacies such as a blocking scheme are what make watching football and endlessly interesting game to watch and learn about. Football seems to have the ultimate balance of wit and skill.</p>
<p>Go Pats! He he!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peggy sue</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-33690</link>
		<dc:creator>peggy sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 04:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-33690</guid>
		<description>The show is just coming out here in KUOW land. I just turned on my radio and heard Christopher Lydon say George Carlin &quot;left something out.&quot; Meanwhile I was just thinking of Carlin and looking this up. In case anyone out there is not familiar with the Carlin comparison... here it is... yeah - I&#039;m sure all you machos sports types have heard it...

George Carlin compares Football to Baseball...

Baseball is a nineteenth-century pastoral game.
Football is a twentieth-century technological struggle.

Baseball is played on a diamond, in a park.The baseball park!
Football is played on a gridiron, in a stadium, sometimes called Soldier Field or War Memorial Stadium.

Baseball begins in the spring, the season of new life.
Football begins in the fall, when everything&#039;s dying.

In football you wear a helmet.
In baseball you wear a cap.

Football is concerned with downs - what down is it?
Baseball is concerned with ups - who&#039;s up?

In football you receive a penalty.
In baseball you make an error.

In football the specialist comes in to kick.
In baseball the specialist comes in to relieve somebody.

Football has hitting, clipping, spearing, piling on, personal fouls, late hitting and unnecessary roughness.
Baseball has the sacrifice.

Football is played in any kind of weather: rain, snow, sleet, hail, fog...
In baseball, if it rains, we don&#039;t go out to play.

Baseball has the seventh inning stretch.
Football has the two minute warning.

Baseball has no time limit: we don&#039;t know when it&#039;s gonna end - might have extra innings.
Football is rigidly timed, and it will end even if we&#039;ve got to go to sudden death.

In baseball, during the game, in the stands, there&#039;s kind of a picnic feeling; emotions may run high or low, but there&#039;s not too much unpleasantness.
In football, during the game in the stands, you can be sure that at least twenty-seven times you&#039;re capable of taking the life of a fellow human being.

And finally, the objectives of the two games are completely different:

In football the object is for the quarterback, also known as the field general, to be on target with his aerial assault, riddling the defense by hitting his receivers with deadly accuracy in spite of the blitz, even if he has to use shotgun. With short bullet passes and long bombs, he marches his troops into enemy territory, balancing this aerial assault with a sustained ground attack that punches holes in the forward wall of the enemy&#039;s defensive line.

In baseball the object is to go home! And to be safe! - I hope I&#039;ll be safe at home!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The show is just coming out here in KUOW land. I just turned on my radio and heard Christopher Lydon say George Carlin &#8220;left something out.&#8221; Meanwhile I was just thinking of Carlin and looking this up. In case anyone out there is not familiar with the Carlin comparison&#8230; here it is&#8230; yeah &#8211; I&#8217;m sure all you machos sports types have heard it&#8230;</p>
<p>George Carlin compares Football to Baseball&#8230;</p>
<p>Baseball is a nineteenth-century pastoral game.<br />
Football is a twentieth-century technological struggle.</p>
<p>Baseball is played on a diamond, in a park.The baseball park!<br />
Football is played on a gridiron, in a stadium, sometimes called Soldier Field or War Memorial Stadium.</p>
<p>Baseball begins in the spring, the season of new life.<br />
Football begins in the fall, when everything&#8217;s dying.</p>
<p>In football you wear a helmet.<br />
In baseball you wear a cap.</p>
<p>Football is concerned with downs &#8211; what down is it?<br />
Baseball is concerned with ups &#8211; who&#8217;s up?</p>
<p>In football you receive a penalty.<br />
In baseball you make an error.</p>
<p>In football the specialist comes in to kick.<br />
In baseball the specialist comes in to relieve somebody.</p>
<p>Football has hitting, clipping, spearing, piling on, personal fouls, late hitting and unnecessary roughness.<br />
Baseball has the sacrifice.</p>
<p>Football is played in any kind of weather: rain, snow, sleet, hail, fog&#8230;<br />
In baseball, if it rains, we don&#8217;t go out to play.</p>
<p>Baseball has the seventh inning stretch.<br />
Football has the two minute warning.</p>
<p>Baseball has no time limit: we don&#8217;t know when it&#8217;s gonna end &#8211; might have extra innings.<br />
Football is rigidly timed, and it will end even if we&#8217;ve got to go to sudden death.</p>
<p>In baseball, during the game, in the stands, there&#8217;s kind of a picnic feeling; emotions may run high or low, but there&#8217;s not too much unpleasantness.<br />
In football, during the game in the stands, you can be sure that at least twenty-seven times you&#8217;re capable of taking the life of a fellow human being.</p>
<p>And finally, the objectives of the two games are completely different:</p>
<p>In football the object is for the quarterback, also known as the field general, to be on target with his aerial assault, riddling the defense by hitting his receivers with deadly accuracy in spite of the blitz, even if he has to use shotgun. With short bullet passes and long bombs, he marches his troops into enemy territory, balancing this aerial assault with a sustained ground attack that punches holes in the forward wall of the enemy&#8217;s defensive line.</p>
<p>In baseball the object is to go home! And to be safe! &#8211; I hope I&#8217;ll be safe at home!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ideaguy</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-33672</link>
		<dc:creator>ideaguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-33672</guid>
		<description>I rarely read about sports anymore, but I loved Michael Lewis&#039;s recent article on Michael Oher in the NYT magazine. How is he doing at Ole Miss - on and off the field? And, while we&#039;re on the subject, how does BYU get away with offering those &quot;gut courses&quot; online?

Thanks!
Bill McDonough in Beverly MA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rarely read about sports anymore, but I loved Michael Lewis&#8217;s recent article on Michael Oher in the NYT magazine. How is he doing at Ole Miss &#8211; on and off the field? And, while we&#8217;re on the subject, how does BYU get away with offering those &#8220;gut courses&#8221; online?</p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
Bill McDonough in Beverly MA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessmm</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-33670</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-33670</guid>
		<description>What about the cult of fantasy football? If it&#039;s the plays and the strategies that are so important, what&#039;s the allure of concocting the &quot;pefect line?&quot; Is a virtual play-making game too much in the line of a chemistry set in terms of relevant play?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about the cult of fantasy football? If it&#8217;s the plays and the strategies that are so important, what&#8217;s the allure of concocting the &#8220;pefect line?&#8221; Is a virtual play-making game too much in the line of a chemistry set in terms of relevant play?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emmettoconnell</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/comment-page-1/#comment-33665</link>
		<dc:creator>emmettoconnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/the-evolution-of-football/#comment-33665</guid>
		<description>As much as i understand the cultural differences between baseball and football, I cringe when people refer to baseball as a &quot;thinking&quot; sport, while football is all about brute force. As the topic of this show will likely display, football has become so much more complicated in the past 50 years than baseball. From run-and-shoot to West Coast offense, there have been very few similar developments on the baseball side. The middle reliever or the DH.

There are as many subtle points to football as there are in baseball, but rather the culture surounding the sport makes it seem more brute.

An awesome study of college football culture is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rammerjammeryellowhammer.com/weblog/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Rammer Jammer Yellow Hammer&lt;/a&gt;, the story (and blog) or Warren St John as he follows the Crimson Tide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as i understand the cultural differences between baseball and football, I cringe when people refer to baseball as a &#8220;thinking&#8221; sport, while football is all about brute force. As the topic of this show will likely display, football has become so much more complicated in the past 50 years than baseball. From run-and-shoot to West Coast offense, there have been very few similar developments on the baseball side. The middle reliever or the DH.</p>
<p>There are as many subtle points to football as there are in baseball, but rather the culture surounding the sport makes it seem more brute.</p>
<p>An awesome study of college football culture is <a href="http://www.rammerjammeryellowhammer.com/weblog/" rel="nofollow">Rammer Jammer Yellow Hammer</a>, the story (and blog) or Warren St John as he follows the Crimson Tide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
