<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: They Got It Right: (2) Michael Desch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.radioopensource.org/they-got-it-right-2-michael-desch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/they-got-it-right-2-michael-desch/</link>
	<description>Christopher Lydon in conversation on arts, ideas and politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:09:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Potter</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/they-got-it-right-2-michael-desch/#comment-91820</link>
		<dc:creator>Potter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=1169#comment-91820</guid>
		<description>I believe &lt;b&gt;Tom Friedman&lt;/b&gt; got rich, if he is rich by marrying money  ( and I don&#039;t care), not by getting Iraq wrong but also by his (much praised) writing before Iraq on the Israeli Palestinian conflict and after with his books on popularizing Globalization.



Also- regarding those that &quot;got it wrong&quot;- this is too wide a category to throw a lot of people into including presidential candidates. Some got it totally wrong. Some were very nuanced about it-i.e. we should only go to war if...... Some have reversed since and especially shortly after the invasion. Some have been constructive since.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe <b>Tom Friedman</b> got rich, if he is rich by marrying money  ( and I don&#8217;t care), not by getting Iraq wrong but also by his (much praised) writing before Iraq on the Israeli Palestinian conflict and after with his books on popularizing Globalization.</p>
<p>Also- regarding those that &#8220;got it wrong&#8221;- this is too wide a category to throw a lot of people into including presidential candidates. Some got it totally wrong. Some were very nuanced about it-i.e. we should only go to war if&#8230;&#8230; Some have reversed since and especially shortly after the invasion. Some have been constructive since.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Potter</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/they-got-it-right-2-michael-desch/#comment-91819</link>
		<dc:creator>Potter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=1169#comment-91819</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t howling through David Kaiser&#039;s Kristol file.



It&#039;s human nature to have ears for what you want to hear and that&#039;s what I think holds up Kristol and Kagan, Frum and the others. Whether what they say is in touch with reality is beside the point because there is obviously an audience for the good news, even about war, even if it&#039;s fabricated, even if we know somewhere in our brains that it can&#039;t be so. Reality is too hard.

from Kaiser:



&lt;i&gt;Meanwhile, Kristolâ€™s columns have neverâ€”literally neverâ€”seriously addressed the human costs of this war. He has never referred to the two million refugees that have left Iraq or the roughly equal number that have been internally displaced. He has not discussed the tactics of Shiâ€™ite and Sunni militias very much, or even alluded to the basic factâ€”surely an indicator of something?â€”that no American has been able to go anywhere in Iraq without armed escort for years. And he has never said much about the Americans who are actually fighting the war. On September 23, 2003, in one of his first calls for more forces, Kristol made an interesting remark. â€œAnd contrary to what some say,â€ he and Robert Kagan wrote, â€œmore troops don&#039;t mean more casualties. More troops mean fewer casualties--both American and Iraqi.â€ &lt;/i&gt;



Disconcerting, Kristol wears a smirk only a &lt;a href=&quot;http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/1216&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mother&lt;/a&gt; would love.  In this case a mother  in academia, preoccupied with morality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t howling through David Kaiser&#8217;s Kristol file.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s human nature to have ears for what you want to hear and that&#8217;s what I think holds up Kristol and Kagan, Frum and the others. Whether what they say is in touch with reality is beside the point because there is obviously an audience for the good news, even about war, even if it&#8217;s fabricated, even if we know somewhere in our brains that it can&#8217;t be so. Reality is too hard.</p>
<p>from Kaiser:</p>
<p><i>Meanwhile, Kristolâ€™s columns have neverâ€”literally neverâ€”seriously addressed the human costs of this war. He has never referred to the two million refugees that have left Iraq or the roughly equal number that have been internally displaced. He has not discussed the tactics of Shiâ€™ite and Sunni militias very much, or even alluded to the basic factâ€”surely an indicator of something?â€”that no American has been able to go anywhere in Iraq without armed escort for years. And he has never said much about the Americans who are actually fighting the war. On September 23, 2003, in one of his first calls for more forces, Kristol made an interesting remark. â€œAnd contrary to what some say,â€ he and Robert Kagan wrote, â€œmore troops don&#8217;t mean more casualties. More troops mean fewer casualties&#8211;both American and Iraqi.â€ </i></p>
<p>Disconcerting, Kristol wears a smirk only a <a  href="http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/1216" rel="nofollow">mother</a> would love.  In this case a mother  in academia, preoccupied with morality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Potter</title>
		<link>http://www.radioopensource.org/they-got-it-right-2-michael-desch/#comment-91818</link>
		<dc:creator>Potter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 10:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.radioopensource.org/?p=1169#comment-91818</guid>
		<description>Okay- William Kristol makes my blood boil. I am going stright for the linked howlers.



And for Hurley I am adding Richard Perle, David Frum and Fred Kagan.



I only listened to this once but I think I heard it said that the American people were 90% plus for the war. Not so. I have researched the polls. If you read them, a majority were not for the war in the months leading up, and certainly they wanted multilateral action if we did go. It was only after being demagogued on the Saddam-9/11 connection over and over and over did opinions begin to move in favor. What really helped it seems was Colin Powells appearance at the UN. If we really want to hold people accountable- at the top on my list would be Powell. He was someone who so many saw as a man of integrity. If he resigned at the proper time, it would have meant something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay- William Kristol makes my blood boil. I am going stright for the linked howlers.</p>
<p>And for Hurley I am adding Richard Perle, David Frum and Fred Kagan.</p>
<p>I only listened to this once but I think I heard it said that the American people were 90% plus for the war. Not so. I have researched the polls. If you read them, a majority were not for the war in the months leading up, and certainly they wanted multilateral action if we did go. It was only after being demagogued on the Saddam-9/11 connection over and over and over did opinions begin to move in favor. What really helped it seems was Colin Powells appearance at the UN. If we really want to hold people accountable- at the top on my list would be Powell. He was someone who so many saw as a man of integrity. If he resigned at the proper time, it would have meant something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

