Torture, Part 3: the Philip Gourevitch version

Bookmark and Share

In our third go at this miserable business of sanctioned American torture, Philip Gourevitch turns it around, Pogo-style. We have met the victims, he says in effect, and they are us.

To Listen: Get Adobe Flash Player, or download an mp3 at the bottom of the post.

Philip Gourevitch (photo: Andrew Brucker)

Even if you want to put it into culture war terms, or a war of our principles versus theirs, or our civilization versus theirs – we’ve violated the principles that we claim our civilization stands for, in order to fight off this threat to our civilization. That’s what’s so incoherent about it. That’s where, when I look at these photographs from Abu Graib, when I look at the story, a lot of what I wrote this book for is to ask not ‘why did we go?’ and ‘how did we de-humanize them? and do these things to them?’ It’s ‘how did we do this to ourselves? Why are we doing this to ourselves?’ Maybe the best way to get us to stop doing it is not to ask why are we doing this to them – why are we doing this to ourselves?

Philip Gourevitch of Standard Operating Procedure, in conversation with Chris Lydon in James Der Derian’s global security seminar at Brown’s Watson Institute, September 17, 2008

Philip Gourevitch’s book, Standard Operating Procedure, is of course the hard-cover partner of the Errol Morris movie.

Gourevitch‘s eye and story-telling pen are as powerful as any thousand pictures from Abu Ghraib. This is his reading, for example, of the interrogation (with the help of dogs) of a prize prisoner called “AQ” (for Al Qaeda) before he turned out finally to be a used-car dealer in Baghdad, a man of no political or security interest:

Once again Smith moved in with the animal. In one picture you see it lunging, ears back, a black blur of muscle and jaw… Smith is in the picture, crouching over the dog, restraining him and urging him on at the same time.

It does not seem possible to amplify the drama of this moment, but the look on AQ’s face does just that. He has the horrified, drawn-back, and quivering expression of a thoroughly blasted soul. It is all there in his eyes, moist and mad with fear, fixed on a mouthful of fangs. What secrets does he have that we want so badly, but are so precious to him that he endures this day after day? The answer in AQ’s case was none. Once again at Abu Ghraib they had the wrong guy, or they had the guy wrong, and when they realized this after several months of dogs and bondage and hooding and noise and sleeplessness and heat and cold and who knows just what other robust counter-resistance techniques, they told him to scram, and closed his case. The pictures of AQ on that night before New Year’s are the last known photographs of our prisoners on the MI block at Abu Ghraib, which seems fitting, because these pictures don’t leave much to the viewer’s imagination, except the obvious question: if you fight terror with terror, how can you tell which is which?

Philip Gourevitch, Standard Operating Procedure.

As Abu Ghraib was the sequel to Guantanamo, our classroom conversation with Philip Gourevitch flows out of our session two days earlier with Philippe Sands — and Sands’ point that the criminal torture story began with President Bush’s dismissal of the Geneva Conventions in February, 2002 and “migrated” from there. One of the Morris-Gourevitch interviews with the investigator Tim Dugan gets it all into a nutshell, in the vernacular:

Tim Dugan was summoned to join a meeting with Colonel Pappas to discuss the interrogation of this fresh crop of Saddam cronies. Pappas explained that he’d just got off a conference call with General Sanchez and the secretary of defense. “He said, ‘We’re starting a special projects team, and we’re going to break the back of the resistance. Anybody who doesn’t want to volunteer for this has to leave the room. And if you volunteer, you can’t talk about this to anybody,’” Dugan said. “We all volunteered and he said all approach techniques were authorized. Someone asked, ‘Even dogs?’ And he says, ‘yep, even dogs.’ He’s like, ‘We got a chance to break this unlawful insurgency, and the people in an unlawful insurgency have no protection under the Geneva Conventions.’”

Dugan thought that was pretty definitive. “If the fuckin’ secretary of defense designates the motherfucker an unlawful insurgency, I mean, what the fuck am I supposed to say? It’s an unlawful insurgency, wouldn’t you think? He’s the second-highest motherfucker in the country during the war.”

Philip Gourevitch, Standard Operating Procedure.
viagra
free viagra
buy viagra online
generic viagra
how does viagra work
cheap viagra
buy viagra
buy viagra online inurl
viagra 6 free samples
viagra online
viagra for women
viagra side effects
female viagra
natural viagra
online viagra
cheapest viagra prices
herbal viagra
alternative to viagra
buy generic viagra
purchase viagra online
free viagra without prescription
viagra attorneys
free viagra samples before buying
buy generic viagra cheap
viagra uk
generic viagra online
try viagra for free
generic viagra from india
fda approves viagra
free viagra sample
what is better viagra or levitra
discount generic viagra online
viagra cialis levitra
viagra dosage
viagra cheap
viagra on line
best price for viagra
free sample pack of viagra
viagra generic
viagra without prescription
discount viagra
gay viagra
mail order viagra
viagra inurl
generic viagra online paypal
generic viagra overnight
generic viagra online pharmacy
generic viagra uk
buy cheap viagra online uk
suppliers of viagra
how long does viagra last
viagra sex
generic viagra soft tabs
generic viagra 100mg
buy viagra onli
generic viagra online without prescription
viagra energy drink
cheapest uk supplier viagra
viagra cialis
generic viagra safe
viagra professional
viagra sales
viagra free trial pack
viagra lawyers
over the counter viagra
best price for generic viagra
viagra jokes
buying viagra
viagra samples
viagra sample
cialis
generic cialis
cheapest cialis
buy cialis online
buying generic cialis
cialis for order
what are the side effects of cialis
buy generic cialis
what is the generic name for cialis
cheap cialis
cialis online
buy cialis
cialis side effects
how long does cialis last
cialis forum
cialis lawyer ohio
cialis attorneys
cialis attorney columbus
cialis injury lawyer ohio
cialis injury attorney ohio
cialis injury lawyer columbus
prices cialis
cialis lawyers
viagra cialis levitra
cialis lawyer columbus
online generic cialis
daily cialis
cialis injury attorney columbus
cialis attorney ohio
cialis cost
cialis professional
cialis super active
how does cialis work
what does cialis look like
cialis drug
viagra cialis
cialis to buy new zealand
cialis without prescription
free cialis
cialis soft tabs
discount cialis
cialis generic
generic cialis from india
cheap cialis sale online
cialis daily
cialis reviews
cialis generico
how can i take cialis
cheap cialis si
cialis vs viagra
levitra
generic levitra
levitra attorneys
what is better viagra or levitra
viagra cialis levitra
levitra side effects
buy levitra
levitra online
levitra dangers
how does levitra work
levitra lawyers
what is the difference between levitra and viagra
levitra versus viagra
which works better viagra or levitra
buy levitra and overnight shipping
levitra vs viagra
canidan pharmacies levitra
how long does levitra last
viagra cialis levitra
levitra acheter
comprare levitra
levitra ohne rezept
levitra 20mg
levitra senza ricetta
cheapest generic levitra
levitra compra
cheap levitra
levitra overnight
levitra generika
levitra kaufen
download an mp3

4 Responses to “Torture, Part 3: the Philip Gourevitch version”

  1. josephmoyer Says:

    I watched an episode of Charlie Rose some weeks ago with Mr. Gourevitch, what an impressive fellow. His discussion here opened my eyes wider and turned me back on, flipped the switch so as to keep me awake and interested in what is going on, to keep me aware of what is being done in the name of our United States.

  2. seltzer Says:

    Thank you for continuing this series, Chris. I am grateful that others in this country have not forgotten about Abu Gharaib and the Pandora’s box opened there. I feel compelled to counter Philip Gourevitch’s assessment that we as Americans aren’t outraged or haven’t protested the normalization of torture. I may be just one citizen, but I have signed countless petitions and donated to Amnesty International, and other human rights’ organizations, hoping that someday in the not too distant future, the leaders of my country will come to their senses and reject this barbarism. Perhaps I take this too personally, but I am nauseated by the idea that my tax dollars in however small a way subsidize torture.

  3. orangescissor Says:

    It seemed like Philip Gourevitch was struggling to put in the clearest language and in the simplest terms that we as a nation need to face the torture practices we have accepted as national defense policy. We are smart people, and I am sure there are a tremendous variety of other questions Philip Gourevitch could (and probably would rather) be asking, but right now it seems that even when using the clearest and simplest language to explain the crimes committed in the name of national defense, many of us are still missing the message. After hearing this interview, the question of whether Gourevitch’s message will stick and be developed is something that I think might indicate changes in American collective identity: what will it take to face Abu Ghraib, and how can America reconcile the continuation of these past, documented crimes that haunt our present?

    I have a suspicion that we might forget, but we cannot blame it on a dearth of information after hearing from Morris, Sands and Gourevitch.

  4. Mike Brisco Says:

    Australia (where I live) is a signed-up member of the “Coalition of the willing”. Decisions the US takes, affect us. Our politicians go along uncritically, without Parliamentary debate without discussion.

    Australian troops in Iraq, did detain people. There was concern at the time, whether Australian troops might be abusing prisoners. The politicians answered, Australians could sleep easy, we were not involved at all in that type of thing. We did not operate prisons. Our troops handed over detainees immediately to the US. Yes, there might be a few problems – but these were isolated, a few low-ranking soldiers, & you always get a few bad apples. Australian military acted in good faith, & could not be aware of absolutely everything taht went on in US-run prisons in Iraq.

    But Gourevitch says, the entire system was involved in abuses, and was open about it. That means, our military would have been aware or at least had cause to suspect.

    Australians are not yet discussing, complicity in torture/abuse. However if that is what we were – Gourevitch makes a good case – it is important we know that and own up to it.

    Gourevitch’s book is avaialble here, & he did a few short radio interviews. His argument is important. So it is valuable to hear him speak at length.

Write a Reply



As you comment, please remember that you can disagree, but to do so with respect.