Virtual JFK: Vietnam (and us) if Kennedy had lived

Recorded
Mon, October 06

Six crisis decisions forecast the seventh

Find a way to see Virtual JFK — a documentary film chasing a what-if riddle — and have your own presidential debate before choosing between John McCain and Barack Obama.

The question in Virtual JFK is whether President Kennedy, had he lived, would have withdrawn from war in Vietnam in 1965. It is at least arguable that what hangs on the answer is nothing less than the fighting (mostly losing) “counter-insurgency” doctrine that has fired up American foreign policy for nearly half a century, and that accounts for the “permanent war” dread through the Bush years and beyond.

Click to listen to Chris’s conversation with Koji Masutani and James Blight (33 minutes, 15 mb mp3)

Presidents matter, and presidential temperament is decisive: these are the fundamental premises of the film, and the moral for voters this year. Koji Masutani, 27, made Virtual JFK with his Brown University professor of history and international relations, James Blight. Together they have chosen six “crises” from the early Sixties in which restraint prevailed: the Bay of Pigs fiasco in which Kennedy blocked US Marines from saving the misbegotten mission; the flare-up and ceasefire in Laos in Spring, 1961; the Berlin crisis over the Soviets’ wall in August, 1961, when JFK pulled US tanks out of sight; Kennedy’s early rejection in 1961 of his generals’ plea (including his favorite, Max Taylor) for military intervention in Vietnam; the Cuban missile crisis of 1962, talked down by a “cautious, skeptical” president; and the secret staff planning in October, 1963 to start drawing down the American advisers in Vietnam.

It is clear to Jim Blight, anyway, that JFK’s instinct and persistent pattern were to avoid the war option, to say “no” to his generals, to engage his own restless, combative mind in peaceful, face-saving alternatives. Kennedy was a multilateralist, a man with a delicately balanced reading of an interconnected world. He did not hesitate to speak of his and our responsibility to “mankind” and “the human race.” He would have welcomed “the global test” of American policies. He spoke of “adversaries,” not “enemies.” He dealt with interests, not “evil.” He said: “I hope I am a responsible president. That is my intention.”

Koji Masutani

What the contrarian viewer sees as well is that JFK was up to his neck, at least, in Cold War reflexes. Those wacko nuclear bomb shelters were “useful… important,” he says in a press conference. Kennedy bought the domino doctrine that the fate of Southeast Asia was all or nothing, and he sold the silly simplistic line that nasty “guerrilas” were disrupting a peaceful democracy in South Vietnam. In his lesser moments Kennedy can sound shockingly close to George W. Bush, needling up fear and hostility around catch-phrases like “the most dangerous time in the history of the human race.” But then, what if it really was?

The seductive beauty of Virtual JFK is watching the play of doubt and responsibility, learning and wit on the weathered face of a 45-year-old war hero who is, unbelievably, the president of the United States.

KM: Imagine sitting in an editing studio in the dark for three years, hours and hours a day, having grown up with parents who are not American… I am listening to Kennedy, a president who is articulate, essentially disarming. I found this very surprising, as if he was an alien. I am just surprised that we have been here before: muddled in a war that can’t fully be explained. In the second part, we get in to Lyndon Johnson, someone who uses the kind of rhetoric that George Bush uses today, in absolutes.

JB:It’s so interesting because Johnson’s tapes are phone tapes and it feels like you’re sitting right there with the man himself. For the first three or four months, the phone tapes with McNamara show that McNamara, in a sense unconsciously still thinks he’s talking to Kennedy because he keeps interrupting him, and that is not something that is done with Johnson. He also keeps bringing data to bear on the situation, and Johnson doesn’t want to hear that either… until about March when…we did a rough calculation: about 50% of McNamara’s interventions after that are “yes, sir.” There is no known instance of a conversation with Kennedy that we have on tape where Kennedy talks and McNamara says “yes, sir.” It’s McNamara talks and Kennedy asks questions and then thinks about it…

KM:Kennedy required competitive information. At every meeting Kennedy wanted to hear from people who disagreed with him, and then under Johnson there was evidence that he wanted a consensus to take place before the meeting occurred…

Koji Masutani and James Blight of Virtual JFK in conversation with Chris Lydon, September 29, 2008

Koji Masutani conceived his movie before the shape of the 2008 race was remotely clear. The movie never mentions Barack Obama, but one feels that Obama has been growing into the Kennedy role. Ted Sorensen, who wrote many of Kennedy’s best lines, isn’t mentioned in the movie either. But Sorensen figures largely in our conversation here:

James G. Blight

So [we asked] Ted [Sorensen, Kennedy’s former speechwriter] what is it about Barack Obama that reminds you of your former friend and boss. He said, “it’s this: his first reaction will be to think, to consider. It will not be to strike out to strike out at the first opportunity, it seems to Ted, and it seems to me, frankly. That doesn’t make him a ditherer, not a person who is incapable of making a decision, but a person who wants to hear as many points of view as are relevant to the situation as possible and then to move forward and to try to do the least harm. Not an ideologue, not going to try to democratize the world and the moon and Mars and everything with it.” The point of leadership, he said, according to Kennedy, was to do as little harm as possible. And he thinks that Obama has kind of internalized that.

James Blight of the Watson Institute at Brown University and Virtual JFK in conversation with Chris Lydon, September 29, 2008
viagra
free viagra
buy viagra online
generic viagra
how does viagra work
cheap viagra
buy viagra
buy viagra online inurl
viagra 6 free samples
viagra online
viagra for women
viagra side effects
female viagra
natural viagra
online viagra
cheapest viagra prices
herbal viagra
alternative to viagra
buy generic viagra
purchase viagra online
free viagra without prescription
viagra attorneys
free viagra samples before buying
buy generic viagra cheap
viagra uk
generic viagra online
try viagra for free
generic viagra from india
fda approves viagra
free viagra sample
what is better viagra or levitra
discount generic viagra online
viagra cialis levitra
viagra dosage
viagra cheap
viagra on line
best price for viagra
free sample pack of viagra
viagra generic
viagra without prescription
discount viagra
gay viagra
mail order viagra
viagra inurl
generic viagra online paypal
generic viagra overnight
generic viagra online pharmacy
generic viagra uk
buy cheap viagra online uk
suppliers of viagra
how long does viagra last
viagra sex
generic viagra soft tabs
generic viagra 100mg
buy viagra onli
generic viagra online without prescription
viagra energy drink
cheapest uk supplier viagra
viagra cialis
generic viagra safe
viagra professional
viagra sales
viagra free trial pack
viagra lawyers
over the counter viagra
best price for generic viagra
viagra jokes
buying viagra
viagra samples
viagra sample
cialis
generic cialis
cheapest cialis
buy cialis online
buying generic cialis
cialis for order
what are the side effects of cialis
buy generic cialis
what is the generic name for cialis
cheap cialis
cialis online
buy cialis
cialis side effects
how long does cialis last
cialis forum
cialis lawyer ohio
cialis attorneys
cialis attorney columbus
cialis injury lawyer ohio
cialis injury attorney ohio
cialis injury lawyer columbus
prices cialis
cialis lawyers
viagra cialis levitra
cialis lawyer columbus
online generic cialis
daily cialis
cialis injury attorney columbus
cialis attorney ohio
cialis cost
cialis professional
cialis super active
how does cialis work
what does cialis look like
cialis drug
viagra cialis
cialis to buy new zealand
cialis without prescription
free cialis
cialis soft tabs
discount cialis
cialis generic
generic cialis from india
cheap cialis sale online
cialis daily
cialis reviews
cialis generico
how can i take cialis
cheap cialis si
cialis vs viagra
levitra
generic levitra
levitra attorneys
what is better viagra or levitra
viagra cialis levitra
levitra side effects
buy levitra
levitra online
levitra dangers
how does levitra work
levitra lawyers
what is the difference between levitra and viagra
levitra versus viagra
which works better viagra or levitra
buy levitra and overnight shipping
levitra vs viagra
canidan pharmacies levitra
how long does levitra last
viagra cialis levitra
levitra acheter
comprare levitra
levitra ohne rezept
levitra 20mg
levitra senza ricetta
cheapest generic levitra
levitra compra
cheap levitra
levitra overnight
levitra generika
levitra kaufen
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave an Audio Reply

Use the application on the left to record your comments.

You can comment by phone by dialing 857-362-1660.

 

3 Responses to “Virtual JFK: Vietnam (and us) if Kennedy had lived”

  1. aaronhemeon Says:

    Both as a Canadian and a person who consciously avoids newspapers and everyday politics I am a foreigner in this conversation. However, what strikes me is the excerpt from Kennedy’s “American University” speech. As Chris puts it, today peace is a hard sell; or as Kennedy states, “too many of us think that [peace] is impossible” which is a “dangerous, defeatist belief. It leads to the conclusion that war is inevitable…” Prior to this Koji Masutani was talking about the cynical reactions to Obamian idealism and refers to the idea JFK espoused that “crises or problems are man-made and, therefore, can be solved by men.” Masutani asks us to enlighten him.

    As a philosophy student who sits in an ethics class among many people who side with Hobbesian descriptions of the “natural state of humanity,” I can offer a description of one area from which this cynicism sprouts.

    The ‘is/ought’ analysis such that humanity is fundamentally in a state of war, therefore we ought to behave in certain ways, sways many minds in universities. The idea being, the sooner people get ‘realistic’ about the ‘nature of humanity,’ the sooner the ‘idealists’ will stop fooling themselves. Of course, this is usually accompanied with a tell-tale sneer. The idea which follows is that in order to prevent civil war a nation must bind together to conquer other nations.

    The trouble I have with Hobbes (tracing back to Plato’s “Myth of Gyges”) is the neglect to address Socratic aims. Hobbes assumes that the pursuit of the good life hinges on the attainment of power and resources. Socrates, however, rightly asserted that even if one possessed the ability to act in any way without getting caught, one would still have reason to “do the right thing” so that, among other reasons, one could enjoy self improvement of character.

    Psychology tells us that, in the long run, Hobbesian-type pleasures are ephemeral, where as the benefit of building genuine human relationships promote longer lasting joy. The same thing that holds for individuals also holds for nations. Anyone who has put in the effort in their lives to work on maintaining caring human friendships will be quite aware of the priceless value of such bonds. The future will be characterized by the quality of the experiences we can promote, not the amount of objects we possess or the degree of authority we impose.

    Once Hobbesian sayings such as “human beings are fundamentally evil” are replaced with Socratic sayings such as “evil human beings are fundamentally confused,” I think cynicism will fall out of fashion — although, I never thought it was very attractive.

  2. robm Says:

    I cannot top being a philosophy student and a Canadian.
    I do think that things would have turned ‘differently’ had there not been Johnson (civil rights) or Nixon (China). Not that these things wouldn’t have happened anyway. I’m no fan of either, BTW. The current President Bush has shown us the worst. Let us hope the next President shows us the best.

  3. dr-seuss Says:

    Aaronhemeon,

    First your comment and then my response.

    “Anyone who has put in the effort in their lives to work on maintaining caring human friendships will be quite aware of the priceless value of such bonds. The future will be characterized by the quality of the experiences we can promote, not the amount of objects we possess or the degree of authority we impose”.

    Wisdom is not necessarily more abundant when materialism is lacking. The two may never meet or they can commingle in harmonious ways. Or, the entire polarity can be functionally inverted. Consider the huge amounts of money Bill Gates and Oprah Winfrey spend on charity. Pointing at people saying “Oh, look how shallow…” (I know you didn’t actually say that, I’m saying it to illustrate a point) is not only duplicitous, but also passé. Individual temperament, cultural position, and varying psychological factors is what decides the “quality of experiences”, not some inanimate philosophical precept. Socrates was wrong about “doing the right thing” (in this context) because not everyone is interested in improving their character. Dare I suggest that not everyone is capable of improving their character? Look at it this way. Those of us of introspective or poetic bent may be more ‘likely’ to improve our character, but not those who are content or have chosen not to, or those who have never figured out how – which is in no way a litmus test to someone’s character. Then again, what do you mean by “character”?

Write a Reply

Want to leave a written comment? Log In.