Whose Words These Are (15): Bloom’s Hart Crane
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

We’re in the “living labyrinth” of Harold Bloom’s astonishing memory here.
The great sage of New Haven is walking us through the dark, dense maze of his first and favorite poet, Hart Crane (1899 – 1932).
Take this as a sort of companion piece to go with Helen Vendler’s reflections on her own “closest poet,” Wallace Stevens.
There’s a preview, too, of Harold Bloom’s next big book, coming in Spring, 2010, just before his 80th birthday. Living Labyrinth: Literature and Influence will reconsider his famous grand argument in The Anxiety of Influence (1973) about poets and their precursors.
But the joy of this conversation for me is the generous, melting demonstration of Bloom’s theory and his method — tracing (with never a glance at text or note) the spidery links from Crane’s words and images back to Melville, Yeats, Milton, Spenser, Walter Pater, and The Song of Songs in the Hebrew Bible; with real-life anecdotes thrown in touching Hart Crane’s friend the photographer Walker Evans, and his devotee the playwright Tennessee Williams. By the end of Harold Bloom’s living-room performance, one of Hart Crane’s most famous pieces, “The Broken Tower” makes a kind of music — madly, deeply in tune with Bud Powell’s “Un Poco Loco.” Listen for Professor Bloom’s laughing indulgence when I tell him that, of course, Harold, the living labyrinth is you! “A nice trope, my boy.”

Here, for before and after readings, is what Bloom calls Crane’s “death poem”:
The Broken Tower
The bell-rope that gathers God at dawn
Dispatches me as though I dropped down the knell
Of a spent day – to wander the cathedral lawn
From pit to crucifix, feet chill on steps from hell.Have you not heard, have you not seen that corps
Of shadows in the tower, whose shoulders sway
Antiphonal carillons launched before
The stars are caught and hived in the sun’s ray?The bells, I say, the bells break down their tower;
And swing I know not where. Their tongues engrave
Membrane through marrow, my long-scattered score
Of broken intervals… And I, their sexton slave!Oval encyclicals in canyons heaping
The impasse high with choir. Banked voices slain!
Pagodas campaniles with reveilles out leaping-
O terraced echoes prostrate on the plain!…And so it was I entered the broken world
To trace the visionary company of love, its voice
An instant in the wind (I know not whither hurled)
But not for long to hold each desperate choice.My world I poured. But was it cognate, scored
Of that tribunal monarch of the air
Whose thighs embronzes earth, strikes crystal Word
In wounds pledges once to hope – cleft to despair?The steep encroachments of my blood left me
No answer (could blood hold such a lofty tower
As flings the question true?) -or is it she
Whose sweet mortality stirs latent power?-And through whose pulse I hear, counting the strokes
My veins recall and add, revived and sure
The angelus of wars my chest evokes:
What I hold healed, original now, and pure…And builds, within, a tower that is not stone
(Not stone can jacket heaven) – but slip
Of pebbles, – visible wings of silence sown
In azure circles, widening as they dipThe matrix of the heart, lift down the eyes
That shrines the quiet lake and swells a tower…
The commodious, tall decorum of that sky
Unseals her earth, and lifts love in its shower.







November 14th, 2009 at 5:42 pm
Our friend, soulful deejay Tom Reney, emails from Holyoke, Massachusetts:
What better way to begin this dreary Saturday morning in which rain is dampening the “fiery parcels” of Holyoke (arson capitol of the Commonwealth) than with your conversation with Harold? I agree, Hart Crane is a little impenetrable, all that “impacted density,” but this is illuminating both of the poetry and Bloom’s connection with Bud Powell. When Harold spoke of this with me a few years ago, he described Bud as being conversant with Crane’s poetry, which I found a bit dubious. But to hear him say here that he gave Bud a volume of the poems which he then read makes more sense. Harold also picked up on my passion for Prez, aka Lester Young, as he inscribed a copy of his then new book Hamlet: Poem Unlimited : “For Tom Reney, Another exalter of the Only true President.”
Professor Bloom’s concluding remark with you that “Powell’s gift was too great for Powell” seems applicable to so many, but how especially true of the black creative geniuses whose lives were hobbled by racism and the neglect their work suffered in the hierarchical standing of the fine arts, not to mention the occupational restrictions that were still in force during Bud’s time and that made music virtually the only available outlet for his genius.
November 18th, 2009 at 10:15 am
Magnificent Chris!!
Cornel West and Howard Bloom within a few weeks of one another. It just doesn’t get any better than that!!!
November 18th, 2009 at 5:54 pm
It’s always great to hear from Harold Bloom.
I hope Chris will have him back to discuss religion/spirituality.
November 19th, 2009 at 9:55 pm
When I woke up this morning, my radio was playing songs by a piano trio that disturbed me. The pianist was hammering at his ideas and playing with very little touch. Yet, through the cacophony, the brilliance of the lines (the lines) was still present. I told my wife, “This is late Bud Powell….it’s too sad to listen to this.” When the set was through, the DJ confirmed my suspicions. It was recorded late in Powell’s life in Europe.
Listening to this podcast was a nice remedy to that experience. I’m looking forward to spending some time with Crane and Powell this weekend. Thank you Prof. Bloom, and to you Chris for opening up new avenues to listen to.
November 29th, 2009 at 7:42 am
Taking Harold Bloom’s Shakespeare course at Yale was like being tazed by Lear, so I anticipate electrocution when I see him coming back to your microphone. Hearing his conversations with you over the years, Chris, I have been annoyed at his lack of consideration for your audience, cutting off the boots of your questions, showing either base contempt or irrational praise for a given caller’s attempt to share or understand. These are dismissable complaints when weighed against the value of his reading. But do I hear the Sage of New Haven becoming less dismissive? It’s almost as if his raging against death (on our behalf) has softened into something more … communal? Or was it just the prize you dangled of allowing Bud Powell into the conversation? That Poco Loco cowbell does hold something for Harold that he doesn’t have to hold.